Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
6-8 encounters/day - how common is this?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Libramarian" data-source="post: 6839846" data-attributes="member: 6688858"><p>Yes, you're right. When I said a short rest whenever I was thinking whenever the players like, which will be after almost every encounter when your adventure model is 3-4 deadly+. The important variable for balancing short and long rest classes is the ratio between short and long rests (assuming equivalent resource depletion).</p><p></p><p>I don't find it hard to believe that the designers would want to let the DM know how many encounters the typical party can get through while knowing that this won't happen in practice most of the time. To get the number of encounters the PCs do get through to consistently align with the number of encounters they can get through requires rest restriction (of the sort @<em><strong><u><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=6788736" target="_blank">Flamestrike</a></u></strong></em> advocates), which is not a trivial modification of the game and the DMG doesn't give an advice on how to do that. So I find it hard to believe that the designers expect that to occur.</p><p></p><p>In the typical adventure the players get a "free" rest at the end--when you clear the dungeon and go back to town you rest whether you need to or not. So if the DM prepares a 6-8 encounter dungeon, and the party takes one long rest during (say when they feel that the "boss fight" is coming up) and one after completing it, that's like 5 or 6 encounters before the first long rest, and then 1 or 2 tougher ones at the end. I'm sure they realize that's how the typical adventure plays out.</p><p></p><p>Yes, trying to control encounters per day is a clumsy way to troubleshoot the game. I think in most cases it's better to encourage the party to take more short rests than to try to prevent them from taking long rests.</p><p></p><p>That changes the ratio of short to long rests. If you run the numbers comparing 6 encounters with a short rest after every second vs 3 encounters with a short rest after each (same 2:1 ratio of short to long rests), you will find the classes are balanced similarly.</p><p></p><p>There are a few additional considerations: long rest classes have more AoE abilities and (slightly) weaker basic attacks, which is an advantage with fewer encounters, and with longer adventuring days they're also more likely to be too conservative using their abilities, "wasting" them more often. So I would expect the short rest classes to come out a bit ahead when you look at damage inflicted and healed with 2 short rests per long rest to account for that. If not, I would admit that implies the game is balanced to some extent in favor of longer ADs.</p><p></p><p>Planning encounter by encounter is too on-the-nose for me. I prefer the sandbox approach where you leave the choice of when to rest in the hands of the players but add more variables and greater variance into the encounters and the environment to make it a more interesting choice. My focus is on giving the players interesting decisions to make, not depleting the PCs' resources. A game that's hard on the PCs is not necessarily hard on the players.</p><p></p><p>I don't like to plan for variety in general. That's inefficient. If more variety would make the game better you should use more randomness in your adventure design procedure.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, I don't disagree with the rest of your post. If you ramp up encounter difficulty to the point where you get 5MWD issues then you do have to start restricting rests, either with hard limits or stiff disincentives. I'm pointing out that the DMG doesn't advocate this, and by default rests are only very mildly disincentivized, not to argue that restricting rests is a bad idea but to cast doubt on the notion that the statement that the party has enough resources to last 6-8 encounters constitutes advice that the game plays best with 6-8 encounter days.</p><p></p><p>There's nothing magical about 6-8 encounters/day. The magic number, to the extent that there is one, is 2 short rests per long rest.</p><p></p><p>The game seems designed to play well with a variety of encounters per day.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Libramarian, post: 6839846, member: 6688858"] Yes, you're right. When I said a short rest whenever I was thinking whenever the players like, which will be after almost every encounter when your adventure model is 3-4 deadly+. The important variable for balancing short and long rest classes is the ratio between short and long rests (assuming equivalent resource depletion). I don't find it hard to believe that the designers would want to let the DM know how many encounters the typical party can get through while knowing that this won't happen in practice most of the time. To get the number of encounters the PCs do get through to consistently align with the number of encounters they can get through requires rest restriction (of the sort @[I][B][U][URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=6788736"]Flamestrike[/URL][/U][/B][/I] advocates), which is not a trivial modification of the game and the DMG doesn't give an advice on how to do that. So I find it hard to believe that the designers expect that to occur. In the typical adventure the players get a "free" rest at the end--when you clear the dungeon and go back to town you rest whether you need to or not. So if the DM prepares a 6-8 encounter dungeon, and the party takes one long rest during (say when they feel that the "boss fight" is coming up) and one after completing it, that's like 5 or 6 encounters before the first long rest, and then 1 or 2 tougher ones at the end. I'm sure they realize that's how the typical adventure plays out. Yes, trying to control encounters per day is a clumsy way to troubleshoot the game. I think in most cases it's better to encourage the party to take more short rests than to try to prevent them from taking long rests. That changes the ratio of short to long rests. If you run the numbers comparing 6 encounters with a short rest after every second vs 3 encounters with a short rest after each (same 2:1 ratio of short to long rests), you will find the classes are balanced similarly. There are a few additional considerations: long rest classes have more AoE abilities and (slightly) weaker basic attacks, which is an advantage with fewer encounters, and with longer adventuring days they're also more likely to be too conservative using their abilities, "wasting" them more often. So I would expect the short rest classes to come out a bit ahead when you look at damage inflicted and healed with 2 short rests per long rest to account for that. If not, I would admit that implies the game is balanced to some extent in favor of longer ADs. Planning encounter by encounter is too on-the-nose for me. I prefer the sandbox approach where you leave the choice of when to rest in the hands of the players but add more variables and greater variance into the encounters and the environment to make it a more interesting choice. My focus is on giving the players interesting decisions to make, not depleting the PCs' resources. A game that's hard on the PCs is not necessarily hard on the players. I don't like to plan for variety in general. That's inefficient. If more variety would make the game better you should use more randomness in your adventure design procedure. Yes, I don't disagree with the rest of your post. If you ramp up encounter difficulty to the point where you get 5MWD issues then you do have to start restricting rests, either with hard limits or stiff disincentives. I'm pointing out that the DMG doesn't advocate this, and by default rests are only very mildly disincentivized, not to argue that restricting rests is a bad idea but to cast doubt on the notion that the statement that the party has enough resources to last 6-8 encounters constitutes advice that the game plays best with 6-8 encounter days. There's nothing magical about 6-8 encounters/day. The magic number, to the extent that there is one, is 2 short rests per long rest. The game seems designed to play well with a variety of encounters per day. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
6-8 encounters/day - how common is this?
Top