Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ahglock" data-source="post: 4624911" data-attributes="member: 56725">I am not happy with how classes were balanced in 4e.  In 4e IMO classes were balanced by making them all suck equally.  While harder to do I'd of preferred they be balanced by making them all awesome equally.     While I think the balance issues in 3e were exaggerated a bit the balance issues were there.  Assuming a non abusive player classes were mostly balanced at most levels outside a few stand out, what were you thinking spells.  By taking out the charged item creation feats,(scrolls, wands, and staves) balance was fairly close to there, though yes spell casters were flat out better at high levels.  I think 2e was more balanced than 3e, and about as well balanced as 4e.  Currently we are having fun playing 4e, but I am worried that as we level the sameness of powers will just end up boring us out of the game.  We like tactical minis games so combat has been fun, just not very immersive or engaging.</blockquote>