Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
75 Feats -- not nearly enough
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FitzTheRuke" data-source="post: 9351033" data-attributes="member: 59816"><p>Mmm. I've never seen an "anti-powergamer" who wasn't also a "method actor"-type player, so I'm not sure how you can think of them as opposed to roleplaying. Maybe they don't want to play a "hero"?</p><p></p><p>Sure, but there's a lot of reasons that a person might find themselves doing that - without being the perfect person for the job. Also, the game is already <em>designed</em> (whether you like how it's designed or not) for any PC, no matter how badly built, to be better-than-average at the act of Adventuring.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Those are the "good" power gamers, sure. Some just want to be more powerful than the other players, or more powerful than the DM's monsters, or other disruptive stuff. The "bad" ones - which is why they get such a bad rap. While it's perfectly possible (as I noted above) for Power Gamers to Belong, that's not where their bad rap comes from!</p><p></p><p></p><p>Those bad apples tend to ruin the bunch, sadly.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Mmm. Again, I think that you're missing that most "anti-powergamers" (who barely exist, IME) are probably one of two things: 1) They don't want to play a game of oneupmanship where the DM just winds up throwing tougher monsters at them to make up for their powerful characters; or 2) They want to triumph through adversity or win while being an underdog. Or just play someone who ought not to be there, in the situation they're in.</p><p></p><p>Or they're a jerk. That happens too (though not as often, if only because I don't think that very many people build purposefully "weak" characters).</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nah, it's just a different choice.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Man, and here there's a LOT of posters who think that D&D is currently stuck on "easy mode" - you make it sound like it's hard to survive without Power Gaming! I really don't think it IS, and yet - I'm not an Anti-Powergamer any more than I'm a Powergamer. Nor do I entirely agree that the game is stuck on easy-mode.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Absolutely.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, I misspoke above. I meant that it doesn't happen in good faith. Not that no one ever scoffs needlessly at other people's playstyles. That obviously happens far too often.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Design Failure? Maybe they just have different priorties to what you're looking for?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Did it? I must have missed that. But I believe you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FitzTheRuke, post: 9351033, member: 59816"] Mmm. I've never seen an "anti-powergamer" who wasn't also a "method actor"-type player, so I'm not sure how you can think of them as opposed to roleplaying. Maybe they don't want to play a "hero"? Sure, but there's a lot of reasons that a person might find themselves doing that - without being the perfect person for the job. Also, the game is already [I]designed[/I] (whether you like how it's designed or not) for any PC, no matter how badly built, to be better-than-average at the act of Adventuring. Those are the "good" power gamers, sure. Some just want to be more powerful than the other players, or more powerful than the DM's monsters, or other disruptive stuff. The "bad" ones - which is why they get such a bad rap. While it's perfectly possible (as I noted above) for Power Gamers to Belong, that's not where their bad rap comes from! Those bad apples tend to ruin the bunch, sadly. Mmm. Again, I think that you're missing that most "anti-powergamers" (who barely exist, IME) are probably one of two things: 1) They don't want to play a game of oneupmanship where the DM just winds up throwing tougher monsters at them to make up for their powerful characters; or 2) They want to triumph through adversity or win while being an underdog. Or just play someone who ought not to be there, in the situation they're in. Or they're a jerk. That happens too (though not as often, if only because I don't think that very many people build purposefully "weak" characters). Nah, it's just a different choice. Man, and here there's a LOT of posters who think that D&D is currently stuck on "easy mode" - you make it sound like it's hard to survive without Power Gaming! I really don't think it IS, and yet - I'm not an Anti-Powergamer any more than I'm a Powergamer. Nor do I entirely agree that the game is stuck on easy-mode. Absolutely. Sure, I misspoke above. I meant that it doesn't happen in good faith. Not that no one ever scoffs needlessly at other people's playstyles. That obviously happens far too often. Design Failure? Maybe they just have different priorties to what you're looking for? Did it? I must have missed that. But I believe you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
75 Feats -- not nearly enough
Top