Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
75 Feats -- not nearly enough
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FitzTheRuke" data-source="post: 9351137" data-attributes="member: 59816"><p>Oh no, I <em>loath</em> method actors. Both as actors and as gamers. I just don't think that they can be accused of "not roleplaying". </p><p></p><p></p><p>I think you're overstating how hard it is to avoid getting killed without power gaming.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh! You mean people that are <em>against</em> power gaming! I thought you were talking about people who engage in <em>reverse-power gaming</em> (like, making terribly weak characters that shouldn't be going on adventures).</p><p></p><p></p><p>We have a very different idea of what "perfect for the job" means. I'm speaking of in-world people who are very good at what they do, with little consideration for the specific numbers of the mechanics.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, and people with 16s in their prime stats are perfectly capable of doing it. And 16s are considered <em>quite rare and exceptional</em> people in their communities.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay? I'm losing your train of thought. </p><p></p><p></p><p>You're not required to be a power gamer to "take your game seriously" - but I can understand why you'd not like someone "writing (a) screed" against a playstyle that you enjoy.</p><p></p><p></p><p>For some reason, I thought you were talking about something else (see above). Though I still question how you get to the idea that someone who doesn't like Power Gaming doesn't like Role Playing. That's just a weird argument to me.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It's only one way to take the premise "seriously". I think I follow what you mean by that, and I think that it's fine to do, but it's not really about taking the game seriously. That's a different thing.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, I can see that.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, that kind of anti-any playstyle person sucks.</p><p></p><p></p><p>For what?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, but the game is about slaying dragons. (Some of the time, anyway).</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, I was more speaking about "non-powergamers" not "anti-powergamers" there.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Right. I get you now.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed. This happens a LOT on these boards - someone posts about enjoying a certain playstyle, and it really, REALLY "sounds" like they are rejecting other playstyles. For instance, it's what YOU sound like you're doing, and I suspect that you think that I'M doing it, when I am no kind of "anti powergamer". Not one bit. I only object to the idea that Power Gamers are Better at the Game (the assertion that I originally commented on). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, but this is often done by power gamers in a "metagame" arena - not within the world, but within the books, finding things that might not naturally be in the DM's setting but forcing them in because they exist in the game, and in particular in rare and poorly balanced splattbooks. </p><p></p><p>Look, it absolutely CAN be done in perfectly good faith, I've acknowledged that! But it is done in Bad Faith often enough that there's a lot of backlash against power gamers, sometimes deserved, and other times not.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I guess? This is just placing the emphasis on the Meta Game in different places. One is not superior to the other.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Mmmm. I'm sure you're right that it sometimes is. Criticizing others for their choices is always <em>bad</em> - but I wouldn't say that it has a direct line to roleplaying like you say. For every power gamer that does it for the roleplaying, like you describe, there are plenty that don't roleplay it at all. My point is not that Power Gamers don't roleplay, but to assert that anyone who <em>doesn't like</em> Power Gaming (whether they qualify as ani-power gamer or not) ALSO doesn't like roleplaying is, IMO, a stretch.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, I mean, I'm not (I'm NEVER) saying that D&D doesn't have problem areas - it's just that our problem areas (whether mine are the same as yours or not) are "bad design" or just "design choices that I don't agree with" is hard to be sure about. It's a very similar problem to playstyles. Do I like my preferred playstyle because it is SUPERIOR or just because I like it? IDK.</p><p></p><p>(For the record, I'm probably most a Storyteller-type player, I am neither a Power Gamer NOR an anti-power-gamer. I like PCs "dialed" to what I would consider about 70%. Neither jacked-up nor weak (nor "Average") I just think that the game runs smoother that way, on both sides of the screen).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FitzTheRuke, post: 9351137, member: 59816"] Oh no, I [I]loath[/I] method actors. Both as actors and as gamers. I just don't think that they can be accused of "not roleplaying". I think you're overstating how hard it is to avoid getting killed without power gaming. Oh! You mean people that are [I]against[/I] power gaming! I thought you were talking about people who engage in [I]reverse-power gaming[/I] (like, making terribly weak characters that shouldn't be going on adventures). We have a very different idea of what "perfect for the job" means. I'm speaking of in-world people who are very good at what they do, with little consideration for the specific numbers of the mechanics. Yes, and people with 16s in their prime stats are perfectly capable of doing it. And 16s are considered [I]quite rare and exceptional[/I] people in their communities. Okay? I'm losing your train of thought. You're not required to be a power gamer to "take your game seriously" - but I can understand why you'd not like someone "writing (a) screed" against a playstyle that you enjoy. For some reason, I thought you were talking about something else (see above). Though I still question how you get to the idea that someone who doesn't like Power Gaming doesn't like Role Playing. That's just a weird argument to me. It's only one way to take the premise "seriously". I think I follow what you mean by that, and I think that it's fine to do, but it's not really about taking the game seriously. That's a different thing. Yeah, I can see that. Yeah, that kind of anti-any playstyle person sucks. For what? Sure, but the game is about slaying dragons. (Some of the time, anyway). Yeah, I was more speaking about "non-powergamers" not "anti-powergamers" there. Right. I get you now. Agreed. This happens a LOT on these boards - someone posts about enjoying a certain playstyle, and it really, REALLY "sounds" like they are rejecting other playstyles. For instance, it's what YOU sound like you're doing, and I suspect that you think that I'M doing it, when I am no kind of "anti powergamer". Not one bit. I only object to the idea that Power Gamers are Better at the Game (the assertion that I originally commented on). Sure, but this is often done by power gamers in a "metagame" arena - not within the world, but within the books, finding things that might not naturally be in the DM's setting but forcing them in because they exist in the game, and in particular in rare and poorly balanced splattbooks. Look, it absolutely CAN be done in perfectly good faith, I've acknowledged that! But it is done in Bad Faith often enough that there's a lot of backlash against power gamers, sometimes deserved, and other times not. I guess? This is just placing the emphasis on the Meta Game in different places. One is not superior to the other. Mmmm. I'm sure you're right that it sometimes is. Criticizing others for their choices is always [I]bad[/I] - but I wouldn't say that it has a direct line to roleplaying like you say. For every power gamer that does it for the roleplaying, like you describe, there are plenty that don't roleplay it at all. My point is not that Power Gamers don't roleplay, but to assert that anyone who [I]doesn't like[/I] Power Gaming (whether they qualify as ani-power gamer or not) ALSO doesn't like roleplaying is, IMO, a stretch. Yeah, I mean, I'm not (I'm NEVER) saying that D&D doesn't have problem areas - it's just that our problem areas (whether mine are the same as yours or not) are "bad design" or just "design choices that I don't agree with" is hard to be sure about. It's a very similar problem to playstyles. Do I like my preferred playstyle because it is SUPERIOR or just because I like it? IDK. (For the record, I'm probably most a Storyteller-type player, I am neither a Power Gamer NOR an anti-power-gamer. I like PCs "dialed" to what I would consider about 70%. Neither jacked-up nor weak (nor "Average") I just think that the game runs smoother that way, on both sides of the screen). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
75 Feats -- not nearly enough
Top