Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
95% of you didn't need the OGL and you don't need ORC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8899930" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>The thing that's worth noting here is that this very much a double-edged sword. Both parties are at risk.</p><p></p><p>A company who comes in claiming a huge number of things are copyright and/or trademark infringement (you'd be looking at both), is taking a big risk.</p><p></p><p>Because it's almost certain that, if they claim a large number of things, they're going to be judged to be wrong on quite a lot of them. And a lot of companies (and apparently the lawyers they employ/hire) don't really realize this.</p><p></p><p>A case I've mentioned a few times which is relevant is <em>Games Workshop vs Chapter House Studios LLC</em>. Chapter House (CHS) were a company which makes minis, mini bits, and so on. They were particularly offering a ton of mini parts to customize GW 40K models, as well as quite a number of straight-up alternative models for 40K vehicles, which you could clearly recognise as 40K vehicles.</p><p></p><p>Games Workshop tried to body them by just dropping literally hundreds of copyright or trademark (which in the US very much includes "trade dress" i.e. stuff that looks like it's yours) infringement claims. Presumably they expected CHS to just buckle, but they didn't, even though they're tiny and GW are pretty huge. This was a US case (Illinois I believe).</p><p></p><p>They did indeed go through every claim, and found in the vast majority of them (about 60-70%) that CHS was either not infringing, or arguably infringing but it was fair use (don't ask me about that subtle distinction but the end result is it's fine). I don't think there's a detailed list of what they won/lost on, but for example, GW were claiming that really big shoulderpads were basically part of the GW IP, and they lost on that, but GW won on for example, some kind of fancy Eldar Jetbike. Overall though, GW lost more than it won - a bunch of stuff it could previously have threatened people about with C&Ds and the like, it could no longer claim.</p><p></p><p>That's actually quite a serious problem. You can't send out a proper C&D or DMCA if you KNOW you don't own that thing, the lawyer sending it will end getting in serious trouble with the bar if a complaint is made (which is not unlikely), even potentially disbarred if they had previous examples of doing it or it was egregious.</p><p></p><p>So the end result for WotC in such a case could easily be that stuff they've long-regarded as being owned by them, IP-wise, suddenly becomes free for anyone to use.</p><p></p><p>EDIT - Looks like Chapter House did shut down five or six years later, but if you want an example of the sort of stuff you can get away with thanks to their court case:</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://spikeybits.com/store/28mm-Sci-fi-Antigrav-Platform-Speeder-Dark-Age-Designs-p365047187[/URL]</p><p></p><p>LEGALLY NOT A SPACE MARINE LAND SPEEDER lol.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8899930, member: 18"] The thing that's worth noting here is that this very much a double-edged sword. Both parties are at risk. A company who comes in claiming a huge number of things are copyright and/or trademark infringement (you'd be looking at both), is taking a big risk. Because it's almost certain that, if they claim a large number of things, they're going to be judged to be wrong on quite a lot of them. And a lot of companies (and apparently the lawyers they employ/hire) don't really realize this. A case I've mentioned a few times which is relevant is [I]Games Workshop vs Chapter House Studios LLC[/I]. Chapter House (CHS) were a company which makes minis, mini bits, and so on. They were particularly offering a ton of mini parts to customize GW 40K models, as well as quite a number of straight-up alternative models for 40K vehicles, which you could clearly recognise as 40K vehicles. Games Workshop tried to body them by just dropping literally hundreds of copyright or trademark (which in the US very much includes "trade dress" i.e. stuff that looks like it's yours) infringement claims. Presumably they expected CHS to just buckle, but they didn't, even though they're tiny and GW are pretty huge. This was a US case (Illinois I believe). They did indeed go through every claim, and found in the vast majority of them (about 60-70%) that CHS was either not infringing, or arguably infringing but it was fair use (don't ask me about that subtle distinction but the end result is it's fine). I don't think there's a detailed list of what they won/lost on, but for example, GW were claiming that really big shoulderpads were basically part of the GW IP, and they lost on that, but GW won on for example, some kind of fancy Eldar Jetbike. Overall though, GW lost more than it won - a bunch of stuff it could previously have threatened people about with C&Ds and the like, it could no longer claim. That's actually quite a serious problem. You can't send out a proper C&D or DMCA if you KNOW you don't own that thing, the lawyer sending it will end getting in serious trouble with the bar if a complaint is made (which is not unlikely), even potentially disbarred if they had previous examples of doing it or it was egregious. So the end result for WotC in such a case could easily be that stuff they've long-regarded as being owned by them, IP-wise, suddenly becomes free for anyone to use. EDIT - Looks like Chapter House did shut down five or six years later, but if you want an example of the sort of stuff you can get away with thanks to their court case: [URL unfurl="true"]https://spikeybits.com/store/28mm-Sci-fi-Antigrav-Platform-Speeder-Dark-Age-Designs-p365047187[/URL] LEGALLY NOT A SPACE MARINE LAND SPEEDER lol. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
95% of you didn't need the OGL and you don't need ORC
Top