Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Infiniti2000" data-source="post: 2939025" data-attributes="member: 31734">Definitely not.&nbsp; I don't think you are using the correct definition of false dilemma.&nbsp; What's the third point of view that might be correct?&nbsp;This is a meaningless and leading statement.&nbsp; It's purely your opinion that it leads to absurdity.&nbsp; I have no idea why you feel it's so, but your opinion is unsubstantiated.&nbsp; I really have no clue why you're coming up with these antagonist qualifiers like &quot;absurd&quot; and &quot;silly&quot;.&nbsp; You have no basis for these comments.&nbsp; It's your opinion, but if you keep wanting to use them, please justify them.&nbsp;Yet again, see above.&nbsp; This is probably some other logical fallacy like an appeal to reason (&quot;believe me even though I offer no proof, what I say makes sense and the opposing viewpoint is silly and absurd&quot;).Absolutely I think it's sensible.&nbsp; The rules are quite clear on this.&quot;Each suit of full plate must be individually fitted to its owner by a master armorsmith, although a captured suit can be resized to fit a new owner at a cost of 200 to 800 (2d4×100) gold pieces.&quot;If you believe what you say, then you must be houseruling full plate not to require the above.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Infiniti2000, post: 2939025, member: 31734"] Definitely not. I don't think you are using the correct definition of false dilemma. What's the third point of view that might be correct? This is a meaningless and leading statement. It's purely your opinion that it leads to absurdity. I have no idea why you feel it's so, but your opinion is unsubstantiated. I really have no clue why you're coming up with these antagonist qualifiers like "absurd" and "silly". You have no basis for these comments. It's your opinion, but if you keep wanting to use them, please justify them. Yet again, see above. This is probably some other logical fallacy like an appeal to reason ("believe me even though I offer no proof, what I say makes sense and the opposing viewpoint is silly and absurd"). Absolutely I think it's sensible. The rules are quite clear on this. "Each suit of full plate must be individually fitted to its owner by a master armorsmith, although a captured suit can be resized to fit a new owner at a cost of 200 to 800 (2d4×100) gold pieces." If you believe what you say, then you must be houseruling full plate not to require the above. [/QUOTE]

Verification