Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ExploderWizard" data-source="post: 6275449" data-attributes="member: 66434">Ok, count me as officially confused. First you say that the 80's boxed sets are superior to the PFBB BECAUSE they offered more purchasable support product.&nbsp; Now Permeton suggests that WOTC might quite reasonably want to do the same and provide supporting product to their own starter set and it sounds &quot;horrendous&quot;?&nbsp; How is this any different? The best of both worlds would be a basic set much like the Moldvay one, which could support lots of additional play without further purchases but is also supported&nbsp; with further products &amp; expansion material for those who like the basic game and would like to get more material for it. The moment product is produced that is completely unplayable without an attachment to a company nipple it CEASES to be a game of the imagination and I will avoid it like spoiled milk.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ExploderWizard, post: 6275449, member: 66434"] Ok, count me as officially confused. First you say that the 80's boxed sets are superior to the PFBB BECAUSE they offered more purchasable support product. Now Permeton suggests that WOTC might quite reasonably want to do the same and provide supporting product to their own starter set and it sounds "horrendous"? How is this any different? The best of both worlds would be a basic set much like the Moldvay one, which [I]could [/I]support lots of additional play without further purchases but is [I]also supported[/I] with further products & expansion material for those who like the basic game and would like to get more material for it. The moment product is produced that is completely unplayable without an attachment to a company nipple it CEASES to be a game of the imagination and I will avoid it like spoiled milk. [/QUOTE]

Verification