Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pour" data-source="post: 5795142" data-attributes="member: 59411">I've learned to ignore them, honestly. The only place that kind of bashing really bothers me is in entirely unrelated threads dedicated to 5e development. Even then, I just gloss over those posts and continue on with the conversation. I imagine that offended vocal percentage will always claim 4e inferior, not D&D, and us fans dumb MMOers or misguided sycophants for the 'lost edition'. It's kind of funny to me at this point, as those people have little to no credibility to me in conversation- nor do they contribute anything meaningful to me personally on the boards related to game theory, my game, or my preferred conversations on ENWorld.Not saying the OP has belittled us, I only skimmed his first post after it became apparent where it was headed, but I really do identify with Dannager's complaint afterward. I think some people have to validate that they didn't follow 4e, and reaffirm the 5e changes so they might return 'home'. None of that is going to change my enjoyment of 4e, though. Usually the more the real edition warriors battle, the worse they look and sound. Don't get dragged into that negativity, man. Rise above. I suppose it does some good how pleasant the OP was at the end, but the message is all the same. Yes, he didn't like it. The real question is why did I even read this thread to begin with, though, hehe.</blockquote>