Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A better basics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 7119831" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>If we're talking "basic" as in "simple"...</p><p></p><p>...then for me for the rules would include Fighter and Rogue. That's it.</p><p></p><p>If reading through a spell list and choosing something is too hard for a person, *and* you as a DM do not want to just create pre-genned characters where the spells have already been chosen for the character (and thus include 3 or 4 cantrips and a pair of 1st level spells)... then you can't include spellcasters. Because spellcasters require a player to read a bunch of spells and choose them. If that's too much to ask, then you just can't include them.</p><p></p><p>Under those restrictions for a starting game... my 'Basic Set' would include a couple things:</p><p></p><p>- Only the 1st and 2nd levels of the Fighter and the Rogue.</p><p>- Most of the Backgrounds in the PHB (because Backgrounds are not difficult to grok, and those are going to be what differentiate most PCs from each other because there aren't different classes to do it for you.)</p><p>- The Core Four races per the current Basic Rules</p><p></p><p>Then I'd produce an 'Expert Set', which include levels 3-10 of the Fighter and the Rogue, including all of the subclasses for both.</p><p></p><p>In addition, it would include the spell lists of the Cleric and Wizard from the current Basic Rules, and in both cases... should a player want to take the "Eldritch Knight" or "Arcane Trickster" subclass... they could choose from the entirety of the Cleric spell list or the Wizard spell list (and <em>maybe</em> throw in a pared-down Druid spell list if I thought they could handle it.)</p><p></p><p>A Fighter plus the Cleric spell list would have the subclass name of Paladin</p><p>A Fighter plus the Druid spell list would have the subclass name of Ranger</p><p>A Fighter plus the Wizard spell list would have the subclass name of Sorcerer</p><p></p><p>A Rogue plus the Cleric spell list would have the subclass name of Cleric</p><p>A Rogue plus the Druid spell list would have the subclass name of Druid</p><p>A Rogue plus the Wizard spell list would have the subclass name of Wizard</p><p></p><p>This way you give the players two levels to learn the game, and then by the time 3rd level comes around, they can decide for themselves whether they think they can handle taking on a couple cantrips and some 1st level spells.</p><p></p><p>That's probably what I'd do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 7119831, member: 7006"] If we're talking "basic" as in "simple"... ...then for me for the rules would include Fighter and Rogue. That's it. If reading through a spell list and choosing something is too hard for a person, *and* you as a DM do not want to just create pre-genned characters where the spells have already been chosen for the character (and thus include 3 or 4 cantrips and a pair of 1st level spells)... then you can't include spellcasters. Because spellcasters require a player to read a bunch of spells and choose them. If that's too much to ask, then you just can't include them. Under those restrictions for a starting game... my 'Basic Set' would include a couple things: - Only the 1st and 2nd levels of the Fighter and the Rogue. - Most of the Backgrounds in the PHB (because Backgrounds are not difficult to grok, and those are going to be what differentiate most PCs from each other because there aren't different classes to do it for you.) - The Core Four races per the current Basic Rules Then I'd produce an 'Expert Set', which include levels 3-10 of the Fighter and the Rogue, including all of the subclasses for both. In addition, it would include the spell lists of the Cleric and Wizard from the current Basic Rules, and in both cases... should a player want to take the "Eldritch Knight" or "Arcane Trickster" subclass... they could choose from the entirety of the Cleric spell list or the Wizard spell list (and [I]maybe[/I] throw in a pared-down Druid spell list if I thought they could handle it.) A Fighter plus the Cleric spell list would have the subclass name of Paladin A Fighter plus the Druid spell list would have the subclass name of Ranger A Fighter plus the Wizard spell list would have the subclass name of Sorcerer A Rogue plus the Cleric spell list would have the subclass name of Cleric A Rogue plus the Druid spell list would have the subclass name of Druid A Rogue plus the Wizard spell list would have the subclass name of Wizard This way you give the players two levels to learn the game, and then by the time 3rd level comes around, they can decide for themselves whether they think they can handle taking on a couple cantrips and some 1st level spells. That's probably what I'd do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A better basics
Top