Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6553684" data-attributes="member: 2525">Look at the post you're referring to.&nbsp; You will find it's full of WOTC releases as well.&nbsp; I think said that again, to make it clear.&nbsp; You're obviously not reading what you're responding to.&nbsp; Which is OK, but then don't chastise others for not responding &quot;right&quot;.Do you not want third party material? Are you actually against third party material? That would be a new argument.&nbsp; It's not one that's been made, or made prominently, in this thread.OK, not &quot;no&quot; support, but &quot;not enough&quot;.&nbsp; I am arguing it's seeing sufficient support, relative to other WOTC releases and PF.&nbsp; Stop with the semantics, and reply to the argument I am actually making.&nbsp; I listed all the official support.&nbsp; You didn't respond.&nbsp; Here it is again, so you can't claim you didn't see it:The core books (PHB, MM, DMG)Three official BIG adventures (Phandelver, Hoard of the Dragon Queen, Rise of Tiamat), and a fourth on the way in less than a month (Princes of the Apocalypse).Four good playtest adventures which are incredibly easy to adapt to current rules (Ghosts of Dragonspear Castle, Legacy of the Crystal Shard, Murder in Baldur's Gate, Scourge of the Sword Coast). DM's ScreenSpell CardsAnd that's not counting the existing conversion notes WOTC published for numerous older adventures with the playtest that would be easily converted.And that's not counting all the articles that include hard, crunch-based rules for 5e, like the mass combat rules.That's all &quot;official support&quot;. How does that compare to the first three months of 3.0e? How does that compare to the first three months of 3.5e? How does that compare to the first three months of 4e? How does that compare to the first three months of PF? Those are all relevant questions.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 6553684, member: 2525"] Look at the post you're referring to. You will find it's full of WOTC releases as well. I think said that again, to make it clear. You're obviously not reading what you're responding to. Which is OK, but then don't chastise others for not responding "right". Do you not want third party material? Are you actually against third party material? That would be a new argument. It's not one that's been made, or made prominently, in this thread. OK, not "no" support, but "not enough". I am arguing it's seeing sufficient support, relative to other WOTC releases and PF. Stop with the semantics, and reply to the argument I am actually making. I listed all the official support. You didn't respond. Here it is again, so you can't claim you didn't see it: The core books (PHB, MM, DMG) Three official BIG adventures (Phandelver, Hoard of the Dragon Queen, Rise of Tiamat), and a fourth on the way in less than a month (Princes of the Apocalypse). Four good playtest adventures which are incredibly easy to adapt to current rules (Ghosts of Dragonspear Castle, Legacy of the Crystal Shard, Murder in Baldur's Gate, Scourge of the Sword Coast). DM's Screen Spell Cards And that's not counting the existing conversion notes WOTC published for numerous older adventures with the playtest that would be easily converted. And that's not counting all the articles that include hard, crunch-based rules for 5e, like the mass combat rules. That's all "official support". How does that compare to the first three months of 3.0e? How does that compare to the first three months of 3.5e? How does that compare to the first three months of 4e? How does that compare to the first three months of PF? Those are all relevant questions. [/QUOTE]

Verification