Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A Board Game style Release Schedule
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HobbitFan" data-source="post: 6554075" data-attributes="member: 6776322"><p>One thing I would say about this whole thing is that WOTC should get credit for what they actually put out. </p><p>If another company puts out great adventures but WOTC has nothing to do with and they aren't actually stated for 5E then you have to convert. WOTC doesn't get points for that one. That doesn't count as an area WOTC supports the game in. </p><p></p><p>The point is I think to get to the bottom of how well we think WOTC is supporting the game and wether the model we can discern they might be using will work. </p><p>What other companies are doing if its not initiated by WOTC or licensed is besides the point really. </p><p>We're talking about what WOTC is doing or not doing.</p><p></p><p>For instance, I question the wisdom of having the only shorter length adventures they release as support only be available to Adventureer's League DMs. That's not cool at all for all the home game people. If you want to make those excusive adventures unique to the League play that's fine but also provide adventures for regular DMs too. </p><p></p><p>I really don't like that they put all their eggs in one basket with the hardback adventure paths.</p><p>I don't like that htye are ignoring the novels.</p><p>I don't like that they are (largely ) ignoring their campaign settings. </p><p>I don't like that they aren't talking to fans about what's coming up next. </p><p></p><p>I love the 5E core books and the designers seem like great people when they talk about he game. They seem to love D&D. </p><p>I don't see the love translated into inspirational, imaginative exciting RPG products yet. </p><p>That's how you support an RPG by inspiring DMs and players to create cool stries, adventures charactersm etc. </p><p>Releasing a board game so WOTc can cash in and make some money doesn't support the RPG at all. </p><p>That's what D&D is...it's an rpg. Before you can talk about expanding the brand or opening new markets you gotta support the core of what you are. </p><p>I'm not sure they are doing that. And I don't know whether its by accident or design. </p><p></p><p>That's the real meat and potatoes of this whol topic I think. Is WOTC doing what they need to to support the RPG? They demonstratively did not in 4E and floundered. Have they found their way again? That's what we'll all trying to figure out by puzzing their release schedule and edition plan out. It seems to me...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HobbitFan, post: 6554075, member: 6776322"] One thing I would say about this whole thing is that WOTC should get credit for what they actually put out. If another company puts out great adventures but WOTC has nothing to do with and they aren't actually stated for 5E then you have to convert. WOTC doesn't get points for that one. That doesn't count as an area WOTC supports the game in. The point is I think to get to the bottom of how well we think WOTC is supporting the game and wether the model we can discern they might be using will work. What other companies are doing if its not initiated by WOTC or licensed is besides the point really. We're talking about what WOTC is doing or not doing. For instance, I question the wisdom of having the only shorter length adventures they release as support only be available to Adventureer's League DMs. That's not cool at all for all the home game people. If you want to make those excusive adventures unique to the League play that's fine but also provide adventures for regular DMs too. I really don't like that they put all their eggs in one basket with the hardback adventure paths. I don't like that htye are ignoring the novels. I don't like that they are (largely ) ignoring their campaign settings. I don't like that they aren't talking to fans about what's coming up next. I love the 5E core books and the designers seem like great people when they talk about he game. They seem to love D&D. I don't see the love translated into inspirational, imaginative exciting RPG products yet. That's how you support an RPG by inspiring DMs and players to create cool stries, adventures charactersm etc. Releasing a board game so WOTc can cash in and make some money doesn't support the RPG at all. That's what D&D is...it's an rpg. Before you can talk about expanding the brand or opening new markets you gotta support the core of what you are. I'm not sure they are doing that. And I don't know whether its by accident or design. That's the real meat and potatoes of this whol topic I think. Is WOTC doing what they need to to support the RPG? They demonstratively did not in 4E and floundered. Have they found their way again? That's what we'll all trying to figure out by puzzing their release schedule and edition plan out. It seems to me... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A Board Game style Release Schedule
Top