Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A (brief) rant about circular discussions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Prestidigitalis" data-source="post: 4734148" data-attributes="member: 74496"><p>Just got back from the official WotC forums, where I was reading a thread about how nasty Attacks vs. Will can be. Dominated every turn, blah blah.</p><p></p><p>Know what came next? Of course you do: a long series of comments in which characters with high Will defenses were described.</p><p></p><p>The problem with these threads (and yes, they happen on ENWorld too) is that collectively they create a vast circular discussion.</p><p></p><p>"Low Will defense? Raise it at the expense of feats that increase damage."</p><p></p><p>"Low damage output? Raise it at the expense of attribute distribution that raises your AC."</p><p></p><p>"Low AC? Raise it at the expense of your Fort."</p><p></p><p>Etc. </p><p></p><p>Ad nauseum.</p><p></p><p>Fade to black.</p><p></p><p> </p><p>Almost all of these discussions completely ignore the elephant in the room: D&D in all it's guises is a matter of balance, tradeoffs and prioritization. You may be weak all over, or you may have a single Achilles Heel. The one thing that is simply NOT an option, short of Gestalt characters or 40-point buy, is to have no weaknesses at all.</p><p></p><p>So a request please: If you are going to suggest a solution to such a problem, please bear in mind that the solution has to work holistically.</p><p></p><p>Otherwise, it is nothing but a comb-over.</p><p></p><p>Rant complete. Entering maintenance cycle. Power off.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Prestidigitalis, post: 4734148, member: 74496"] Just got back from the official WotC forums, where I was reading a thread about how nasty Attacks vs. Will can be. Dominated every turn, blah blah. Know what came next? Of course you do: a long series of comments in which characters with high Will defenses were described. The problem with these threads (and yes, they happen on ENWorld too) is that collectively they create a vast circular discussion. "Low Will defense? Raise it at the expense of feats that increase damage." "Low damage output? Raise it at the expense of attribute distribution that raises your AC." "Low AC? Raise it at the expense of your Fort." Etc. Ad nauseum. Fade to black. Almost all of these discussions completely ignore the elephant in the room: D&D in all it's guises is a matter of balance, tradeoffs and prioritization. You may be weak all over, or you may have a single Achilles Heel. The one thing that is simply NOT an option, short of Gestalt characters or 40-point buy, is to have no weaknesses at all. So a request please: If you are going to suggest a solution to such a problem, please bear in mind that the solution has to work holistically. Otherwise, it is nothing but a comb-over. Rant complete. Entering maintenance cycle. Power off. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A (brief) rant about circular discussions
Top