Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 8108603" data-attributes="member: 16814">Neither of which dispute the validity of the criticism.  Of course I have to make that choice -- it's printed.  Pointing out the issue, though, assists others in making that choice, and discussing solutions also helps others make that choice.  Plus, WotC's doing a lot of revision to products these days, so it's quite possible they might choose to release supplementary material or issue a change if people complain.  I doubt a change, but a supplement's possible.  We're not talking about wholesale revisions, here, but additions to the current material to help it along.YES!!  Rime is a exigent evil that must be stopped!1  People need to know about this so they can help stop it by making purchasing decisions better informed OR having awareness that this issue may need assistance from them the text will not provide!!11!  Only in this way can the evil be halted and prevented from spreading!1!!1eleven!!!You know, I think I might just start leaning into the strawmen like this -- it's kind fun and a break from saying "I didn't say that, you made it up."  Also, /sarc tags.Ah, back to dismissal of criticism because it can't be fixed in the current product.  I thought we weren't doing that?  And, if you respond to me, do not point to other people's arguments as if they're representative of mine.  I have used modules, and was interested in Rime, but this issue and the synopsis I've read indicates that this is, yet again, another WotC module that's trying to be too clever but fails to make it.  There's some good set pieces in there, but I'm not interested in the Icewind Dales enough to buy it for those and the gazetteer section.  That I've decided to not purchase this module (or pick it up on sale or second-hand) doesn't make my criticism less valid or not worth stating.  You need to stop addressing criticism with arguments that try to render the ability to criticism moot.  They're not valid arguments and they don't address the criticism.</blockquote>

Verification