Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A change of perspective: From DM to Player
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ccs" data-source="post: 7106503" data-attributes="member: 6803664"><p>Then you'll hate me. </p><p>I'm not on FB, Twitter, etc. I never read Sage Advice. So unless someone here is discussing it, I never see whatever Crawford, Mearls, etc has said on a subject. <em>And I don't care.</em> </p><p>Because:</p><p><strong>1)</strong>By the time they've weighed in on the subject? Me & mine have already determined a solution that works for us. And since our happiness is all that matters around our tables.... If we add a new member & they don't like our solution? Then we discuss it as a group. In most cases the newcomer simply has to adapt to how we've chosen to do things. You know, "When in Rome" & all. And we're the Romans. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p><strong>2)</strong> I'll excuse typos & printing errors. Sometimes though those really do need corrected. But beyond that I don't have much respect for designers who constantly need to clarify their work, issue errata, etc.</p><p><span style="font-size: 9px"><em>(You can imagine my disdain for the heaps of errata & clarifications from 3x/4e/PF.)</em> </span> </p><p>Sorry, you wrote the book. You had your chance. And you gave me something that I had to fix. So I'm not going to waste my time dwelling upon what else you have to say on the subject as I've already fixed it.</p><p></p><p><strong>3)</strong> I'm not running AL stuff.</p><p></p><p><strong>4)</strong> <em>"While the material in this booklet is referred to as rules, that is not really correct. Anything in this booklet (and other D&D booklets) should be thought of as changeable - anything, that is, that the Dungeon Master or referee thinks should be changed. This is not to say everything in this booklet should be discarded! All of this material has been carefully thought out and playtested. However, if, after playing the rules as written for a while, you, or your referee (the <strong>Dungeon Master</strong>)think that something should be changed, first think about how the changes will affect the game, and then go ahead. The purpose of these "rules" is to provide <strong>guidelines</strong> that enable you to play and have fun, so don't feel absolutely bound to them."</em></p><p>(emphasis theirs)</p><p></p><p>This quote comes from page B3 of my Moldvay Basic rule book that started me gaming 36 years ago. It's been serving me well ever since. Read the rules, try the rules as is, change as desired after considering their effects.</p><p>Similar advice is found in the 1e DMG.</p><p>D&D is MEANT to be changed to suit the individual groups & their DMs.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em>"Ammunition (such as arrows, bolts, or sling stones) doesn't come in magical versions. You can't craft (or find) a +1 flameburst arrow or a +3 sling stone."</em></p><p></p><p>THIS bit of moronic drivel hails from page 232 of the 4e PHB. This is a stupid rule. A prime example of "Yeah, I like my house rule better. (there were magic arrows in my 4e game). </p><p>We are afterall playing D&D where we have everything from glowing rocks on up to flying castles, player controlled black holes, & every other magical thing you can imagine. Including gods & dimension hopping.</p><p>So WT9Hells were Heinsoo/Collins/Wyatt smoking when they wrote this rule?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I assume by this you only play published adventures? And that the PCs only do actions anticipated by the authors of those adventures?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ccs, post: 7106503, member: 6803664"] Then you'll hate me. I'm not on FB, Twitter, etc. I never read Sage Advice. So unless someone here is discussing it, I never see whatever Crawford, Mearls, etc has said on a subject. [I]And I don't care.[/I] Because: [B]1)[/B]By the time they've weighed in on the subject? Me & mine have already determined a solution that works for us. And since our happiness is all that matters around our tables.... If we add a new member & they don't like our solution? Then we discuss it as a group. In most cases the newcomer simply has to adapt to how we've chosen to do things. You know, "When in Rome" & all. And we're the Romans. :) [B]2)[/B] I'll excuse typos & printing errors. Sometimes though those really do need corrected. But beyond that I don't have much respect for designers who constantly need to clarify their work, issue errata, etc. [SIZE=1][I](You can imagine my disdain for the heaps of errata & clarifications from 3x/4e/PF.)[/I] [/SIZE] Sorry, you wrote the book. You had your chance. And you gave me something that I had to fix. So I'm not going to waste my time dwelling upon what else you have to say on the subject as I've already fixed it. [B]3)[/B] I'm not running AL stuff. [B]4)[/B] [I]"While the material in this booklet is referred to as rules, that is not really correct. Anything in this booklet (and other D&D booklets) should be thought of as changeable - anything, that is, that the Dungeon Master or referee thinks should be changed. This is not to say everything in this booklet should be discarded! All of this material has been carefully thought out and playtested. However, if, after playing the rules as written for a while, you, or your referee (the [B]Dungeon Master[/B])think that something should be changed, first think about how the changes will affect the game, and then go ahead. The purpose of these "rules" is to provide [B]guidelines[/B] that enable you to play and have fun, so don't feel absolutely bound to them."[/I] (emphasis theirs) This quote comes from page B3 of my Moldvay Basic rule book that started me gaming 36 years ago. It's been serving me well ever since. Read the rules, try the rules as is, change as desired after considering their effects. Similar advice is found in the 1e DMG. D&D is MEANT to be changed to suit the individual groups & their DMs. [I]"Ammunition (such as arrows, bolts, or sling stones) doesn't come in magical versions. You can't craft (or find) a +1 flameburst arrow or a +3 sling stone."[/I] THIS bit of moronic drivel hails from page 232 of the 4e PHB. This is a stupid rule. A prime example of "Yeah, I like my house rule better. (there were magic arrows in my 4e game). We are afterall playing D&D where we have everything from glowing rocks on up to flying castles, player controlled black holes, & every other magical thing you can imagine. Including gods & dimension hopping. So WT9Hells were Heinsoo/Collins/Wyatt smoking when they wrote this rule? I assume by this you only play published adventures? And that the PCs only do actions anticipated by the authors of those adventures? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A change of perspective: From DM to Player
Top