Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Community SRD?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Byrons_Ghost" data-source="post: 3317048" data-attributes="member: 7396"><p>I think the main divide here is the difference between published OGL and the fan-created mods for NWN.</p><p></p><p>I don't have any direct experience with NWN or what rycanada is talking about, but I'm guessing that the Community Expansion Pack arose when the game publisher identified several fan-made mods that were universally accepted within the player community, and decided to make them sort of "officially unofficial".</p><p></p><p>This is pretty different from what's going on in the D20/OGL scene:</p><p></p><p>First off, the mod authors (ie small publishers) are marketing their work instead of posting it to community sites. As someone said above, there's dozens of variations on the same class, spell, etc out there, and since everyone is trying to sell their own, there's no reason to come together.</p><p></p><p>Second, the wide adoption of the mods presumably happened within the fan community, and was recognized by the NWN team. What you're proposing seems to be the opposite. There's no universally recognized Swashbuckler variant, for example. Everyone has their own preferences, and uses different versions. So the consensus on which should be used would either come from WotC, or the small publishers, and neither is going to happen.</p><p></p><p>Without the free donations, and the independant evaluations, I don't see this happening. Getting buy-in from either side would be next to impossible.</p><p></p><p>About the only thing I can see working is a group of small publishers, or would-be publishers, banding together to develop their own "SRD 2", sort of like a free online PHB 2. They make all their material themselves, release it freely, and agree that within their group, these will be the standards they adhere to. The actual profit would come from supplemental stuff such as adventures, campaign settings, etc, which use the material.</p><p></p><p>Essentially, this would be replicating what WotC did with the SRD, but on a much smaller scale. As to who would be in that group, I've no idea. An alliance like IPR would probably be best suited to do so, but I don't think they're doing much D20 these days.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Byrons_Ghost, post: 3317048, member: 7396"] I think the main divide here is the difference between published OGL and the fan-created mods for NWN. I don't have any direct experience with NWN or what rycanada is talking about, but I'm guessing that the Community Expansion Pack arose when the game publisher identified several fan-made mods that were universally accepted within the player community, and decided to make them sort of "officially unofficial". This is pretty different from what's going on in the D20/OGL scene: First off, the mod authors (ie small publishers) are marketing their work instead of posting it to community sites. As someone said above, there's dozens of variations on the same class, spell, etc out there, and since everyone is trying to sell their own, there's no reason to come together. Second, the wide adoption of the mods presumably happened within the fan community, and was recognized by the NWN team. What you're proposing seems to be the opposite. There's no universally recognized Swashbuckler variant, for example. Everyone has their own preferences, and uses different versions. So the consensus on which should be used would either come from WotC, or the small publishers, and neither is going to happen. Without the free donations, and the independant evaluations, I don't see this happening. Getting buy-in from either side would be next to impossible. About the only thing I can see working is a group of small publishers, or would-be publishers, banding together to develop their own "SRD 2", sort of like a free online PHB 2. They make all their material themselves, release it freely, and agree that within their group, these will be the standards they adhere to. The actual profit would come from supplemental stuff such as adventures, campaign settings, etc, which use the material. Essentially, this would be replicating what WotC did with the SRD, but on a much smaller scale. As to who would be in that group, I've no idea. An alliance like IPR would probably be best suited to do so, but I don't think they're doing much D20 these days. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Community SRD?
Top