Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A Compilation of Useful Spell Lists (Leugren)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Clockwerk66" data-source="post: 6746678" data-attributes="member: 6801596"><p><strong>Originally posted by Yunru:</strong></p><p></p><p>Top 100 tentacle hentais? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue :P" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" />But seriously, good job.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by mellored:</strong></p><p></p><p>I suggest putting spells into sblocks</p><p> </p><p>like so...</p><p> </p><p>{sblock=non-somatic spells}</p><p>Vicious Mockery [Enchantment] (V) (Bard)</p><p>{/sblock}</p><p> </p><p>Except replace { with [ </p><p> </p><p>and you get..</p><p> </p><p></p><p><strong>non-somatic spells</strong></p><p>[sblock]Vicious Mockery [Enchantment] (V) (Bard)</p><p></p><p>[/sblock]</p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Leugren:</strong></p><p></p><p>Does that make it more difficult for people who want to print or copy-paste these lists?</p><p> </p><p>EDIT: It should be OK as long as I stuff the whole list in and don't try to break it up into sections. I'll do it.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Jay_Ibero_911:</strong></p><p></p><p> </p><p>They would have to open up the sblocks for whatever sections they wanted to print or copy, but once open it looks the same.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by mellored:</strong></p><p></p><p>Yea, it should be fine. </p><p>I'm debating as to weather to suggest also breaking it up by level... you can put sblocks inside slbocks..</p><p> </p><p>probably not, this looks good.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Unforutnatly, there doesn't seem to be enough V only spells to make an usable quadrapaligic caster... <img src="http://community.wizards.com/sites/all/modules/custom/forest_site/smileys/wizards/weep.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Leugren:</strong></p><p></p><p>True. If you can think of any other useful lists, let me know. I've got all of the spell data loaded into a MySQL database running on my machine, front-ended by a Java program that I can customize to generate a new list in a very short amount of time.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by mellored:</strong></p><p></p><p>Non-Concentration buffs?</p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Yunru:</strong></p><p></p><p>Would a Mage Hand count as the needed "hand free"?</p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Leugren:</strong></p><p></p><p>Hmmm. How would one tell by looking at the data that its a buff spell?</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Yunru:</strong></p><p></p><p>I think you'd have to do it manually. At least, initially.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by mellored:</strong></p><p></p><p>Not sure how you setup your database, but spells that don't have instantanious or permanate durration and don't have concentration. </p><p>They might not be buffs, but whatever.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by mellored:</strong></p><p></p><p>Mage hand, unfortunatly, requires a hand. </p><p>But i'll see if my DM will let me "research" an improved mage hand.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Leugren:</strong></p><p></p><p>I'll need to adjust the data a bit, but I should be able to get it done within the next hour or so.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by mellored:</strong></p><p></p><p>Just get all the spells that don't have...</p><p> </p><p>Duration: Instantaneous</p><p>Duration: Concentration</p><p>Duration: Until dispelled</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Leugren:</strong></p><p></p><p>Done. I thinks its a pretty useful list actually, even if it's not as narrowed down as you had originally hoped. It still includes a lot of buffs and debuffs that can be maintained without Concentration.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Clutchbone:</strong></p><p></p><p>Arcane Tricksters are not limited to Enchantment or Illusion cantrips, but otherwise this is great!</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Leugren:</strong></p><p></p><p>Valid point. I forgot about that. I'll fix it, and fix the Eldritch Knight as well. It should be done in a minute.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Yunru:</strong></p><p></p><p>I cannot beleive this hasn't already been request yet but: A list of spells that don't rely on an attribute? Basically anything that doesn't need an attack roll/save DC.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by awaken_D_M_golem:</strong></p><p></p><p><img src="http://community.wizards.com/sites/all/modules/custom/forest_site/smileys/wizards/cheerblue.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /> ... +1</p><p> </p><p>Possibly split the Druid Wildshape list </p><p>into the Conc and Non-Conc spells.</p><p> </p><p>Now that I think about it, with that hard limit </p><p>on 1 conc spell going, other casters can</p><p>benefit from a conc / non-conc separation.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by borg285:</strong></p><p></p><p>I request combat spells be added. I've already tagged them manually</p><p><a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15PcHJh9ImVKCCSffwl-oEz-pqv4EZaZJGzW6JkrHBAw/edit#gid=2129635762" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15PcHJh9ImVKCCSffwl-oEz-pqv4EZaZJGzW6JkrHBAw/edit#gid=2129635762</a></p><p>Please consider the other tags also, like single target, AoE, No save (falling prone for earthqake, heat metal, death ward, [SIZE=110%]Otiluke's Resilient Sphere, [/SIZE][SIZE=110%]Ray of Enfeeblement[/SIZE]).</p><p>Also consider adding a section for Non-concentration long lasting spells. There aren't many, but it's nice to know.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Originally posted by Leugren:</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I'll try to meet some of these requests over the weekend. As for the last one, I already have a list entitled "Non-Instantaneous Spells That Don't Require Concentration to Maintain" (<a href="http://community.wizards.com/comment/51252121#comment-51252121(x)). " target="_blank">http://community.wizards.com/comment/51252121#comment-51252121(x)). </a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Clockwerk66, post: 6746678, member: 6801596"] [b]Originally posted by Yunru:[/b] Top 100 tentacle hentais? :PBut seriously, good job. [b]Originally posted by mellored:[/b] I suggest putting spells into sblocks like so... {sblock=non-somatic spells} Vicious Mockery [Enchantment] (V) (Bard) {/sblock} Except replace { with [ and you get.. [b]non-somatic spells[/b] [sblock]Vicious Mockery [Enchantment] (V) (Bard) [/sblock] [b]Originally posted by Leugren:[/b] Does that make it more difficult for people who want to print or copy-paste these lists? EDIT: It should be OK as long as I stuff the whole list in and don't try to break it up into sections. I'll do it. [b]Originally posted by Jay_Ibero_911:[/b] They would have to open up the sblocks for whatever sections they wanted to print or copy, but once open it looks the same. [b]Originally posted by mellored:[/b] Yea, it should be fine. I'm debating as to weather to suggest also breaking it up by level... you can put sblocks inside slbocks.. probably not, this looks good. Unforutnatly, there doesn't seem to be enough V only spells to make an usable quadrapaligic caster... [IMG]http://community.wizards.com/sites/all/modules/custom/forest_site/smileys/wizards/weep.gif[/IMG] [b]Originally posted by Leugren:[/b] True. If you can think of any other useful lists, let me know. I've got all of the spell data loaded into a MySQL database running on my machine, front-ended by a Java program that I can customize to generate a new list in a very short amount of time. [b]Originally posted by mellored:[/b] Non-Concentration buffs? [b]Originally posted by Yunru:[/b] Would a Mage Hand count as the needed "hand free"? [b]Originally posted by Leugren:[/b] Hmmm. How would one tell by looking at the data that its a buff spell? [b]Originally posted by Yunru:[/b] I think you'd have to do it manually. At least, initially. [b]Originally posted by mellored:[/b] Not sure how you setup your database, but spells that don't have instantanious or permanate durration and don't have concentration. They might not be buffs, but whatever. [b]Originally posted by mellored:[/b] Mage hand, unfortunatly, requires a hand. But i'll see if my DM will let me "research" an improved mage hand. [b]Originally posted by Leugren:[/b] I'll need to adjust the data a bit, but I should be able to get it done within the next hour or so. [b]Originally posted by mellored:[/b] Just get all the spells that don't have... Duration: Instantaneous Duration: Concentration Duration: Until dispelled [b]Originally posted by Leugren:[/b] Done. I thinks its a pretty useful list actually, even if it's not as narrowed down as you had originally hoped. It still includes a lot of buffs and debuffs that can be maintained without Concentration. [b]Originally posted by Clutchbone:[/b] Arcane Tricksters are not limited to Enchantment or Illusion cantrips, but otherwise this is great! [b]Originally posted by Leugren:[/b] Valid point. I forgot about that. I'll fix it, and fix the Eldritch Knight as well. It should be done in a minute. [b]Originally posted by Yunru:[/b] I cannot beleive this hasn't already been request yet but: A list of spells that don't rely on an attribute? Basically anything that doesn't need an attack roll/save DC. [b]Originally posted by awaken_D_M_golem:[/b] [IMG]http://community.wizards.com/sites/all/modules/custom/forest_site/smileys/wizards/cheerblue.gif[/IMG] ... +1 Possibly split the Druid Wildshape list into the Conc and Non-Conc spells. Now that I think about it, with that hard limit on 1 conc spell going, other casters can benefit from a conc / non-conc separation. [b]Originally posted by borg285:[/b] I request combat spells be added. I've already tagged them manually [url]https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15PcHJh9ImVKCCSffwl-oEz-pqv4EZaZJGzW6JkrHBAw/edit#gid=2129635762[/url] Please consider the other tags also, like single target, AoE, No save (falling prone for earthqake, heat metal, death ward, [SIZE=110%]Otiluke's Resilient Sphere, [/SIZE][SIZE=110%]Ray of Enfeeblement[/SIZE]). Also consider adding a section for Non-concentration long lasting spells. There aren't many, but it's nice to know. [b]Originally posted by Leugren:[/b] I'll try to meet some of these requests over the weekend. As for the last one, I already have a list entitled "Non-Instantaneous Spells That Don't Require Concentration to Maintain" ([url]http://community.wizards.com/comment/51252121#comment-51252121(x)). [/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A Compilation of Useful Spell Lists (Leugren)
Top