Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dan'L" data-source="post: 4685674" data-attributes="member: 68954">No, I think that WOTC should trust their own instincts &amp; the results of actual playing, rather than the knee-jerk fears of one portion of its customer base.&nbsp; Is the Battlerager hard to bring down?&nbsp; You bet.&nbsp; That just makes him a better Defender.&nbsp; Oh no, look out!&nbsp; The Fighter might actually be competent in his role!&nbsp; Really, do people want the Fighter to always be the bald-headed stepchild of D&amp;D classes? And balance: is he laying on gobs of damage, too?&nbsp; Probably not, because he's not going to be hitting as much.&nbsp; And if you somehow manage to max out your to-hits, your damage and your gained temp hp, you're probably knuckle dragging in every other ability.&nbsp; Sounds pretty balanced to me.&nbsp; The biggest worry is that this will extend the &quot;grind.&quot;And it sounds like the complaint about Tempest Fighter has little to do with Tempest Figher, and much to do with Double Weapons.-Dan'L</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dan'L, post: 4685674, member: 68954"] No, I think that WOTC should trust their own instincts & the results of actual playing, rather than the knee-jerk fears of one portion of its customer base. Is the Battlerager hard to bring down? You bet. That just makes him a better Defender. Oh no, look out! The Fighter might actually be competent in his role! Really, do people want the Fighter to always be the bald-headed stepchild of D&D classes? And balance: is he laying on gobs of damage, too? Probably not, because he's not going to be hitting as much. And if you somehow manage to max out your to-hits, your damage and your gained temp hp, you're probably knuckle dragging in every other ability. Sounds pretty balanced to me. The biggest worry is that this will extend the "grind." And it sounds like the complaint about Tempest Fighter has little to do with Tempest Figher, and much to do with Double Weapons. -Dan'L [/QUOTE]

Verification