Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Oofta" data-source="post: 8671213" data-attributes="member: 6801845">We clearly disagree. Hardly the end of the world. But that's all there is to it, I don't think we need a change to the fighter you do.&nbsp; I'm not saying my opinion, experiences or preferences are any more valid than anyone else's.&nbsp; I do get a bit tired of all this though, it's not going anywhere.&nbsp; I sincerely doubt anyone from WOTC cares what you or I think.&nbsp; I'd be amazed if they pay much attention to these forums.&nbsp; But even if they do I'm going to express my opinion: I think fighters are fine, I don't think we need another class.&nbsp; I don't know what niche that other class would fill that isn't already filled by one of the fighter subclasses, the paladin, the ranger or the hexblade.&nbsp; If you can do things that are as powerful as spells but you call them something else, they will still be spells in my book because a rose by any other name and all that.I am not telling you that the problem you're having isn't real to you.&nbsp; The question is better stated as: is it a big enough problem for enough people to change the rules?&nbsp; Neither one of us can answer that, but my guess is &quot;no&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Oofta, post: 8671213, member: 6801845"] We clearly disagree. Hardly the end of the world. But that's all there is to it, I don't think we need a change to the fighter you do. I'm not saying my opinion, experiences or preferences are any more valid than anyone else's. I do get a bit tired of all this though, it's not going anywhere. I sincerely doubt anyone from WOTC cares what you or I think. I'd be amazed if they pay much attention to these forums. But even if they do I'm going to express my opinion: I think fighters are fine, I don't think we need another class. I don't know what niche that other class would fill that isn't already filled by one of the fighter subclasses, the paladin, the ranger or the hexblade. If you can do things that are as powerful as spells but you call them something else, they will still be spells in my book because a rose by any other name and all that. I am not telling you that the problem you're having isn't real to you. The question is better stated as: is it a big enough problem for enough people to change the rules? Neither one of us can answer that, but my guess is "no". [/QUOTE]

Verification