Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A critique and review of the Fighter class
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Minigiant" data-source="post: 8672030" data-attributes="member: 63508"><p>One thing I believe is 5e made many mechanical design decisions for the preference of those who aren't mechanics heavy. The fighter's design is the biggest example of it.</p><p></p><p>The fighter lacks core class exploration and social mechanics because those who don't like the mechanics that ascribe flavor to the base classes and would rather roleplay it out. However by doing so, the fighter ended up lacking mechanics that the people who rejected them would have ignored. So those who don't roll Charisma or Intelligence likely responded to omit Charisma and Intelligence features in the core fighter</p><p></p><p>Quite frankly having the fighter being the "noob" class, the "ALL combat" class and the "wide net of warriors" class was likely too much of a strain. It was likely just like the Psion/psychic where the class makes up too many archetypes. It is no wonder the fighter went through the most changes in playtest.</p><p></p><p>If the fighter weren't iconic and required for D&D, it likely would have been binned like the mystic for being too hard to design.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Minigiant, post: 8672030, member: 63508"] One thing I believe is 5e made many mechanical design decisions for the preference of those who aren't mechanics heavy. The fighter's design is the biggest example of it. The fighter lacks core class exploration and social mechanics because those who don't like the mechanics that ascribe flavor to the base classes and would rather roleplay it out. However by doing so, the fighter ended up lacking mechanics that the people who rejected them would have ignored. So those who don't roll Charisma or Intelligence likely responded to omit Charisma and Intelligence features in the core fighter Quite frankly having the fighter being the "noob" class, the "ALL combat" class and the "wide net of warriors" class was likely too much of a strain. It was likely just like the Psion/psychic where the class makes up too many archetypes. It is no wonder the fighter went through the most changes in playtest. If the fighter weren't iconic and required for D&D, it likely would have been binned like the mystic for being too hard to design. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A critique and review of the Fighter class
Top