Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A critique and review of the Fighter class
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 8672384" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>The word you used was "must". There is nothing saying fighters "must not outshine bards". Merely that if a bard is even vaguely trying the fighter pretty much can't other than through extreme optimisation at the cost of their abilities as a fighter. This isn't about must but can.</p><p></p><p>So thank you for confirming this was a straw man.</p><p></p><p>Wearing heavy armour and carrying large weapons does indeed make them more identifiable than sensible people with less uncomfortable and unwieldy equipment. On this we can agree. It also makes them more scary and intimidating than people who may be more powerful but aren't walking into the inn with so much hardware that is both visible and uncomfortable.</p><p></p><p>And if they take their armour and weapons off? They don't have the word "fighter" stamped on their forehead and are less recognisable than people who don't normally cover themselves so completely in metal making themselves unrecognisable.</p><p></p><p>The fighter is likely to be no more responsible for saving the crops from burning than the rest of the party. Indeed they are less likely to be responsible than someone with e.g. the Shape Water cantrip to help put the fire out. And if a charismatic and an uncharismatic character helped that doesn't narrow the gap.</p><p></p><p>So what happened here? A 1:1 roleplay session with only the party member least able to save the crops from burning just so they have some social benefits.</p><p></p><p>I play the game as a group game where in general if one party member helped do something they all did.</p><p></p><p>No. My prize is, or should be, getting to stop you from making posts with multiple straw men in them in order to defend the assertion that the fighter isn't weak. And using as a baseline that the fighter took part in adventures other party members didn't.</p><p></p><p>And one more straw man by you capping your post. I didn't say you said that, I asked what you to clarify one of your strawmen. I gave you a range of possible interpretations that I could understand.</p><p></p><p>But I'm not interested in wasting more time on your special fighter adventures, ignoring the rules, and platoons of strawmen. Goodbye</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 8672384, member: 87792"] The word you used was "must". There is nothing saying fighters "must not outshine bards". Merely that if a bard is even vaguely trying the fighter pretty much can't other than through extreme optimisation at the cost of their abilities as a fighter. This isn't about must but can. So thank you for confirming this was a straw man. Wearing heavy armour and carrying large weapons does indeed make them more identifiable than sensible people with less uncomfortable and unwieldy equipment. On this we can agree. It also makes them more scary and intimidating than people who may be more powerful but aren't walking into the inn with so much hardware that is both visible and uncomfortable. And if they take their armour and weapons off? They don't have the word "fighter" stamped on their forehead and are less recognisable than people who don't normally cover themselves so completely in metal making themselves unrecognisable. The fighter is likely to be no more responsible for saving the crops from burning than the rest of the party. Indeed they are less likely to be responsible than someone with e.g. the Shape Water cantrip to help put the fire out. And if a charismatic and an uncharismatic character helped that doesn't narrow the gap. So what happened here? A 1:1 roleplay session with only the party member least able to save the crops from burning just so they have some social benefits. I play the game as a group game where in general if one party member helped do something they all did. No. My prize is, or should be, getting to stop you from making posts with multiple straw men in them in order to defend the assertion that the fighter isn't weak. And using as a baseline that the fighter took part in adventures other party members didn't. And one more straw man by you capping your post. I didn't say you said that, I asked what you to clarify one of your strawmen. I gave you a range of possible interpretations that I could understand. But I'm not interested in wasting more time on your special fighter adventures, ignoring the rules, and platoons of strawmen. Goodbye [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A critique and review of the Fighter class
Top