Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
A Critique of the LotR BOOKS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FraserRonald" data-source="post: 1319528" data-attributes="member: 7892"><p>And on this, I would add that I personally don't believe an "opinion" as such can be correct or incorrect. That is why it is an opinion. The Oxford Dictionary defines opinion as "1. unproven belief. 2. view held as probable. 3. professional advice. 4. estimation." Now, in some cases, for example, the cost of getting one's car fixed, the opinion can be verifiably proven to be correct or incorrect (however, there's always the problem of not being able to poll every single garage on the planet to find if the opinion was correct somewhere). Of course, once the opinion is proven, it ceases to be an opinion and becomes either fact or fallacy. </p><p></p><p>And, more to the point for this thread, when we are talking about literary criticism, who judges what is correct or incorrect?</p><p></p><p>I don't think that Canis meant to say that all informed opinion is correct. I think, and I would agree, that someone with experience or education on a topic should be offered more credence than someone without the same. As an example, in a discussion of post-Roman British history on a newsgroup some years back, one poster continued to interrupt the scholarly discussion (and not all the participants were academics, just well-read on the subject) with posts regarding King Arthur's use of Dalmatian mercenaries and their historic ties to Troy. Whether one believes in King Arthur or not, our knowledge of the figure that has come to be known as Arthur is dubious at best and does not involve mercenary horsemen from the Balkans. However, if one were to lend as much credence to this individual as someone who had actually researched the period, one might become quite confused.</p><p></p><p>Everyone does have an opinion. In regards to personal matters--liking or disliking RotK, for example--all opinions are equal. Attempting to make wider inferences from these personal opinions--in my opinion--is a mistake. My opinions regarding romance fiction, for example, are fine for myself, but in a discussion regarding the uses, practices and techniques of the same, my opinion is not equal to the opinion of a writer, editor or publisher of romance fiction.</p><p></p><p>At least, that's my opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FraserRonald, post: 1319528, member: 7892"] And on this, I would add that I personally don't believe an "opinion" as such can be correct or incorrect. That is why it is an opinion. The Oxford Dictionary defines opinion as "1. unproven belief. 2. view held as probable. 3. professional advice. 4. estimation." Now, in some cases, for example, the cost of getting one's car fixed, the opinion can be verifiably proven to be correct or incorrect (however, there's always the problem of not being able to poll every single garage on the planet to find if the opinion was correct somewhere). Of course, once the opinion is proven, it ceases to be an opinion and becomes either fact or fallacy. And, more to the point for this thread, when we are talking about literary criticism, who judges what is correct or incorrect? I don't think that Canis meant to say that all informed opinion is correct. I think, and I would agree, that someone with experience or education on a topic should be offered more credence than someone without the same. As an example, in a discussion of post-Roman British history on a newsgroup some years back, one poster continued to interrupt the scholarly discussion (and not all the participants were academics, just well-read on the subject) with posts regarding King Arthur's use of Dalmatian mercenaries and their historic ties to Troy. Whether one believes in King Arthur or not, our knowledge of the figure that has come to be known as Arthur is dubious at best and does not involve mercenary horsemen from the Balkans. However, if one were to lend as much credence to this individual as someone who had actually researched the period, one might become quite confused. Everyone does have an opinion. In regards to personal matters--liking or disliking RotK, for example--all opinions are equal. Attempting to make wider inferences from these personal opinions--in my opinion--is a mistake. My opinions regarding romance fiction, for example, are fine for myself, but in a discussion regarding the uses, practices and techniques of the same, my opinion is not equal to the opinion of a writer, editor or publisher of romance fiction. At least, that's my opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
A Critique of the LotR BOOKS
Top