Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Yair" data-source="post: 2461172" data-attributes="member: 10913">Not to nitpick, but WHY? Why do you need to make sure everything is truly OGC as publicised? Who's forcing you? In an OGL-based wiki you are bound only by the OGL. No terms may be added beyond it, that's part of the license. This means each Contributer (editing the wiki) should declare when he presses "submit" that he has Authority to Contribute, as per Section 5, and maybe change the Section 15 accordingly. But you are under no obligation, as the publisher or maintainer, to make sure that his declaretion is truthful.Should someone complain on a breach, you have 30 days - per Section 13 - to correct it. This is the ONLY source for termination. Indeed, since sublicenses survive you can organize things so that each "edit" is an independent Contribution and so maintain everything but that violating edit even for a longer breach.You are under no obligation to be active. You are obliged to act only when you become aware of a breach, and so can sit back and let anyone concerned email you and tell you about the breach. If they want it fixed, it's their obligation to make you aware.Of course, all this does not apply to the NPC Wiki, which does not follow the OGL.And I am not a lwayer, this is not a legaly binding opinion. etc. etc. etc.</blockquote>