Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A difficult question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sword of Spirit" data-source="post: 5982982" data-attributes="member: 6677017"><p>I thought about this a bit, to try to give an honest answer (rather than deluding myself into thinking I'm more inclusive than my feelings really are).</p><p></p><p>It's important to me 5e that it supports the majority of D&D players from past editions.</p><p></p><p>It's not important to me that it supports components that were exclusive to either 3e or 4e at the <strong>expense</strong> of supporting multi-edition standards. I don't think there is usually going to be a need to choose, because of modularity.</p><p></p><p>In general, I think that 95% of players (and a somewhat smaller majority of DMs) are going to get basically what they want enough to be interested in switching, and that rarely are sacrifices going to need to be made.</p><p></p><p>Specifics:</p><p></p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> I'm <em>not</em> willing to sacrifice the Planescape/Spelljammer unified cosmology as an officially supported and fleshed out option that include relevant rules for using it in all the standard campaign settings to which it was originally connected with (Everything in 2e).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I am willing to sacrifice that cosmology as a default option.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I'm <em>not</em> willing to accept 4e setting <strong>displacing</strong> previous edition setting (including presentation of core subraces and classes).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I am willing to grudgingly sacrifice my "purist" desires to allow core modular inclusion of some innovations I don't like (such as 4e added races), because others do want those.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I am <em>not</em> willing to sacrifice what I consider distinctive features of D&D (traditional races, classes, alignments, Vancian casting, etc) to make it what I objectively confess might be a better <strong>game</strong>. I want the best D&D, because there will, IMO, always be better games out there than D&D, but there shouldn't be better D&D out there than D&D.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I am willing to sacrifice pages of the books to rules I don't need or want to make happy people who do want them.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I am <em>not</em> willing to sacrifice what I feel is the "essence" of pre-3e D&D for a wider audience.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I am willing to accept support for some of that essence relegated to modules.</li> </ul><p></p><p>All those considerations aside, I honestly don't care if the game continues to publish new product after establishing the basic material that I want (which includes core, old-school campaign settings, rules for planes, deities, psionics, oriental adventures, and mass combat).</p><p></p><p>I don't believe the hobby will collapse if D&D folds. As long as I have friends willing to try this "role-playing thing," I don't care about the popularity of the hobby.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sword of Spirit, post: 5982982, member: 6677017"] I thought about this a bit, to try to give an honest answer (rather than deluding myself into thinking I'm more inclusive than my feelings really are). It's important to me 5e that it supports the majority of D&D players from past editions. It's not important to me that it supports components that were exclusive to either 3e or 4e at the [B]expense[/B] of supporting multi-edition standards. I don't think there is usually going to be a need to choose, because of modularity. In general, I think that 95% of players (and a somewhat smaller majority of DMs) are going to get basically what they want enough to be interested in switching, and that rarely are sacrifices going to need to be made. Specifics: [LIST] [*] I'm [I]not[/I] willing to sacrifice the Planescape/Spelljammer unified cosmology as an officially supported and fleshed out option that include relevant rules for using it in all the standard campaign settings to which it was originally connected with (Everything in 2e). [*]I am willing to sacrifice that cosmology as a default option. [*]I'm [I]not[/I] willing to accept 4e setting [B]displacing[/B] previous edition setting (including presentation of core subraces and classes). [*]I am willing to grudgingly sacrifice my "purist" desires to allow core modular inclusion of some innovations I don't like (such as 4e added races), because others do want those. [*]I am [I]not[/I] willing to sacrifice what I consider distinctive features of D&D (traditional races, classes, alignments, Vancian casting, etc) to make it what I objectively confess might be a better [B]game[/B]. I want the best D&D, because there will, IMO, always be better games out there than D&D, but there shouldn't be better D&D out there than D&D. [*]I am willing to sacrifice pages of the books to rules I don't need or want to make happy people who do want them. [*]I am [I]not[/I] willing to sacrifice what I feel is the "essence" of pre-3e D&D for a wider audience. [*]I am willing to accept support for some of that essence relegated to modules. [/LIST] All those considerations aside, I honestly don't care if the game continues to publish new product after establishing the basic material that I want (which includes core, old-school campaign settings, rules for planes, deities, psionics, oriental adventures, and mass combat). I don't believe the hobby will collapse if D&D folds. As long as I have friends willing to try this "role-playing thing," I don't care about the popularity of the hobby. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A difficult question
Top