Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A difficult question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 5987028" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>What do you think the 'Edition War' was? And, even if it wasn't trying to destroy 4e, or wasn't coordinated in the attempt (I would never liken it to a conspiracy, for instance), /it succeeded/. 4e is being destroyed.</p><p></p><p>IMHO, 4e /did/ broaden their appeal, and it attracted a lot of new players, who, if they aren't promptly alienated, might well stay with the game for the /next/ 30 years. That's worth the investment - and the 'loss' of some grognards to Paizo.</p><p></p><p>Though I do get the revenue-motive for trying to drag everyone under the 5e umbrella, I don't see it having much chance of success. Only the current 4e fans can be forcibly dragged (by using legal BS to suppress 4e), and that's more likely to drive them from the hobby than force them to adopt 5e. Everyone else will just stick with the edition they already like. 5e might be enough like one of those eds 'but better' to capture that one segment of the fanbase, but that's a best-case scenario and strikes me as terribly unlikely.</p><p></p><p>AFICT, here, what's going on is that the industry has long since become niche, but D&D, resting on it's 'first RPG' laurels, can't face up to the fact. The niche of 2e was 'grognards who reject change,' niche of 3.x was 'power-mad system mastery,' and the niche of 4e was probably just 'casual play' (not that there wasn't plenty for serious gamers, but what it did /better/ than competing games was casual play).</p><p></p><p>Not even close, and Heinsoo working on it doesn't make it so. It's being marketed as another retro-clone of classic D&D, just more a spiritual than a mechanical clone - a step-child, perhaps.</p><p></p><p>Something we agree on!</p><p>Though I know, intellectually, that he's a talented designer, I just can't bring myself to give anything from the guy who brought us 'rewards for system mastery,' a fair shake. Yes, it means I'm not as good a person as I could be, but I'll continue that struggle on other fronts...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 5987028, member: 996"] What do you think the 'Edition War' was? And, even if it wasn't trying to destroy 4e, or wasn't coordinated in the attempt (I would never liken it to a conspiracy, for instance), /it succeeded/. 4e is being destroyed. IMHO, 4e /did/ broaden their appeal, and it attracted a lot of new players, who, if they aren't promptly alienated, might well stay with the game for the /next/ 30 years. That's worth the investment - and the 'loss' of some grognards to Paizo. Though I do get the revenue-motive for trying to drag everyone under the 5e umbrella, I don't see it having much chance of success. Only the current 4e fans can be forcibly dragged (by using legal BS to suppress 4e), and that's more likely to drive them from the hobby than force them to adopt 5e. Everyone else will just stick with the edition they already like. 5e might be enough like one of those eds 'but better' to capture that one segment of the fanbase, but that's a best-case scenario and strikes me as terribly unlikely. AFICT, here, what's going on is that the industry has long since become niche, but D&D, resting on it's 'first RPG' laurels, can't face up to the fact. The niche of 2e was 'grognards who reject change,' niche of 3.x was 'power-mad system mastery,' and the niche of 4e was probably just 'casual play' (not that there wasn't plenty for serious gamers, but what it did /better/ than competing games was casual play). Not even close, and Heinsoo working on it doesn't make it so. It's being marketed as another retro-clone of classic D&D, just more a spiritual than a mechanical clone - a step-child, perhaps. Something we agree on! Though I know, intellectually, that he's a talented designer, I just can't bring myself to give anything from the guy who brought us 'rewards for system mastery,' a fair shake. Yes, it means I'm not as good a person as I could be, but I'll continue that struggle on other fronts... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A difficult question
Top