Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A discussion of metagame concepts in game design
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aldarc" data-source="post: 7465519" data-attributes="member: 5142"><p>That entire world in D&D is presumed magical. You are trying to apply a modernist mindset that distinguishes between the mundane and the magical to a world that presumes a premodern worldview wherein the supernatural, magical, and irrational are infused into everything of the cosmos. Everything. In such a worldview, whether you are playing 0E-5E, there is no "just a mundane person" in this world. The supernatural infuses every fiber of the world, and this is abundantly evident in the Great Wheel and D&D's other various cosmologies. </p><p></p><p>And therein is my problem. Others and I have a different vision and conception of "the world they are playing in," wherein abilities like Second Wind and Action Surge are plausible from the perspective of in-character choice and their worldview. I suspect that you are thinking like a modernist playing this game. You believe there to be distinction between natural and supernatural as opposed to simply The World as Imagined. You are possibly failing to live up to your own self-professed Actor stance. You are not imagining <em>their</em> world. A world with a different set of presumptions. A world that lacks any distinction between the natural and supernatural, between magical and mundane. You are not imagining what it would be like in the world that D&D presumes because you are too busy presuming that you are playing with this world in mind from a modernist perspective. This is something that I have even advised newplayers to fantasy roleplaying and modern Euro-American students when looking at the pre-modern world. There is no distinction between natural and supernatural. (Actually Runequest gets this pre-modern worldview remarkably well.) </p><p></p><p>Of course. </p><p></p><p>Fate points are outside of the purview of the character, though one could rework them in-character, which could be potentially interesting as a reskin. Fate points are not primarily used for authoring though, but for acting. More often than not, Fate points are used when the Actor wants to embrace or lean into their role at important, key moments. And yes, Fate points may also be used in occurrences when the Actor may desire to provide more "authorship" over the setting in ways that are applicable to the setting. Because just like in the context of D&D: all actors are authors. They have created their characters and they have a sense of their character's identity and not everything of that sort needs to be done outside of gameplay. In Fate, this may entail points where the PC declares that "they know a guy who can help" or some other story detail (e.g., "I pull out anti-shark repellent out of my bat utility belt."). In this role, they are both Actor and Author; it is neither an either/or situation, as the Actor is developing their sense of character and roleplaying who that character is. Nothing, and I do mean nothing, inherently forces the Actor out of Actor stance when they spend a Fate point. I have watched entire games of Fate done entirely from 1st person, in-character speak and roleplaying as character. The decisions were made, rejected, and formulated from in-character perspectives. </p><p></p><p>Fate points are a metacurrency that exist as "a measure of how much influence you have to make the story go in your character’s favor," as per the Fate rules, but I have a slightly different additional take. Fate points also exist as a metacurrency possessed by the GM and Players that serves to reinforce and negotiate the Social Contract between all roleplay game participants through a means of checks and balances during, through, and within gameplay. Fate points give players more control over their sense of character. They give players opportunities to veto the narrative that the GM may impose on their characters. But they also give a way for the GM to tacitly check against the acting of players for points where there is a discrepancy of character and the acting (e.g., you are playing your LG character as CE, why isn't your hydrophobic character acting afraid of water, etc.). </p><p></p><p>Again, I contend that there is no "Pure Actor Stance," much as there is no Pure Scotsman. It is an inherent impossibility within the presumed framework of its very own theory and in praxis. You can say that you aspire to maximize the Actor's stance and minimize the Director and Author stances of players, but please stop talking about Pure Actor Stance as if it was something that you have achieved and was even plausible. </p><p></p><p>I don't know. I think that there are a lot of metagame elements to D&D and other games that get overlooked or a free pass because of familiarity. It says nothing about whether or not I like those elements. But I also don't necessarily mind metagame mechanics, so it is not a case of making a "fuss about something I dislike," though that criticism would certainly apply to others. </p><p></p><p>As I said before, the metagame is often about the gameplay. Fouls are a part of basketball's meta in how the game is played even though by nature they represent inappropriate or "foul" gameplay. Likewise, we may hate excessive diving in Fußball, but it's undoubtedly part of the meta.</p><p></p><p>That is how Stress works in Fate too. Consequences can put more "meat" on the character, but Stress boxes are functionally as you describe here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aldarc, post: 7465519, member: 5142"] That entire world in D&D is presumed magical. You are trying to apply a modernist mindset that distinguishes between the mundane and the magical to a world that presumes a premodern worldview wherein the supernatural, magical, and irrational are infused into everything of the cosmos. Everything. In such a worldview, whether you are playing 0E-5E, there is no "just a mundane person" in this world. The supernatural infuses every fiber of the world, and this is abundantly evident in the Great Wheel and D&D's other various cosmologies. And therein is my problem. Others and I have a different vision and conception of "the world they are playing in," wherein abilities like Second Wind and Action Surge are plausible from the perspective of in-character choice and their worldview. I suspect that you are thinking like a modernist playing this game. You believe there to be distinction between natural and supernatural as opposed to simply The World as Imagined. You are possibly failing to live up to your own self-professed Actor stance. You are not imagining [I]their[/I] world. A world with a different set of presumptions. A world that lacks any distinction between the natural and supernatural, between magical and mundane. You are not imagining what it would be like in the world that D&D presumes because you are too busy presuming that you are playing with this world in mind from a modernist perspective. This is something that I have even advised newplayers to fantasy roleplaying and modern Euro-American students when looking at the pre-modern world. There is no distinction between natural and supernatural. (Actually Runequest gets this pre-modern worldview remarkably well.) Of course. Fate points are outside of the purview of the character, though one could rework them in-character, which could be potentially interesting as a reskin. Fate points are not primarily used for authoring though, but for acting. More often than not, Fate points are used when the Actor wants to embrace or lean into their role at important, key moments. And yes, Fate points may also be used in occurrences when the Actor may desire to provide more "authorship" over the setting in ways that are applicable to the setting. Because just like in the context of D&D: all actors are authors. They have created their characters and they have a sense of their character's identity and not everything of that sort needs to be done outside of gameplay. In Fate, this may entail points where the PC declares that "they know a guy who can help" or some other story detail (e.g., "I pull out anti-shark repellent out of my bat utility belt."). In this role, they are both Actor and Author; it is neither an either/or situation, as the Actor is developing their sense of character and roleplaying who that character is. Nothing, and I do mean nothing, inherently forces the Actor out of Actor stance when they spend a Fate point. I have watched entire games of Fate done entirely from 1st person, in-character speak and roleplaying as character. The decisions were made, rejected, and formulated from in-character perspectives. Fate points are a metacurrency that exist as "a measure of how much influence you have to make the story go in your character’s favor," as per the Fate rules, but I have a slightly different additional take. Fate points also exist as a metacurrency possessed by the GM and Players that serves to reinforce and negotiate the Social Contract between all roleplay game participants through a means of checks and balances during, through, and within gameplay. Fate points give players more control over their sense of character. They give players opportunities to veto the narrative that the GM may impose on their characters. But they also give a way for the GM to tacitly check against the acting of players for points where there is a discrepancy of character and the acting (e.g., you are playing your LG character as CE, why isn't your hydrophobic character acting afraid of water, etc.). Again, I contend that there is no "Pure Actor Stance," much as there is no Pure Scotsman. It is an inherent impossibility within the presumed framework of its very own theory and in praxis. You can say that you aspire to maximize the Actor's stance and minimize the Director and Author stances of players, but please stop talking about Pure Actor Stance as if it was something that you have achieved and was even plausible. I don't know. I think that there are a lot of metagame elements to D&D and other games that get overlooked or a free pass because of familiarity. It says nothing about whether or not I like those elements. But I also don't necessarily mind metagame mechanics, so it is not a case of making a "fuss about something I dislike," though that criticism would certainly apply to others. As I said before, the metagame is often about the gameplay. Fouls are a part of basketball's meta in how the game is played even though by nature they represent inappropriate or "foul" gameplay. Likewise, we may hate excessive diving in Fußball, but it's undoubtedly part of the meta. That is how Stress works in Fate too. Consequences can put more "meat" on the character, but Stress boxes are functionally as you describe here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A discussion of metagame concepts in game design
Top