Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A discussion of metagame concepts in game design
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7471049" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>I think this. I'm an engineer, and rely on math daily to create. But, I also think that math cannot be proven by anything other than inference, and therefore a lot of our knowledge that is based on math is similarly based on inference. This means that it's possible that the math we trust is merely a good enough model for where we are, much like Newtonian physics is good enough for most daily needs but unreliable for things like space travel (GPS satellites don't work without a relativistic correction to time, frex). Maybe we're incapable of doing better, maybe one day we will, maybe what we have is right, but there's enough places where the math we now understand just fails to work that I can't really fully believe we have it right. Right enough for now, sure.</p><p></p><p>Example: the imaginary number. It's critical to many functions in our daily life -- AC power, communications, etc. However, it has no mathematical representation we can resolve. For those that don't know, the imaginary number is the representation of the square root of -1. There exists no number that, when multiplied by itself, equals -1. But we have math that generates square roots of negative numbers that we need to resolve, so we've invoked the imaginary number to do the work. And it does the work -- we get answers we can use to predict and operate on. However, we've had to break our fundamental understanding of numbers to do so and apply a patch. That's not a feature of a discovered truth, it's a feature of a theory that has a hole that can be patched with a few assumptions. Who knows, perhaps there's a number concept out there that handles the imaginary number naturally and also does everything else we need it to do, or maybe we have the whole thing wrong but it's still hella useful anyway (all models are wrong, some are useful), or maybe it really is unanswerable by our intellect or by the current state of physical laws.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 7471049, member: 16814"] I think this. I'm an engineer, and rely on math daily to create. But, I also think that math cannot be proven by anything other than inference, and therefore a lot of our knowledge that is based on math is similarly based on inference. This means that it's possible that the math we trust is merely a good enough model for where we are, much like Newtonian physics is good enough for most daily needs but unreliable for things like space travel (GPS satellites don't work without a relativistic correction to time, frex). Maybe we're incapable of doing better, maybe one day we will, maybe what we have is right, but there's enough places where the math we now understand just fails to work that I can't really fully believe we have it right. Right enough for now, sure. Example: the imaginary number. It's critical to many functions in our daily life -- AC power, communications, etc. However, it has no mathematical representation we can resolve. For those that don't know, the imaginary number is the representation of the square root of -1. There exists no number that, when multiplied by itself, equals -1. But we have math that generates square roots of negative numbers that we need to resolve, so we've invoked the imaginary number to do the work. And it does the work -- we get answers we can use to predict and operate on. However, we've had to break our fundamental understanding of numbers to do so and apply a patch. That's not a feature of a discovered truth, it's a feature of a theory that has a hole that can be patched with a few assumptions. Who knows, perhaps there's a number concept out there that handles the imaginary number naturally and also does everything else we need it to do, or maybe we have the whole thing wrong but it's still hella useful anyway (all models are wrong, some are useful), or maybe it really is unanswerable by our intellect or by the current state of physical laws. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A discussion of metagame concepts in game design
Top