Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A discussion of metagame concepts in game design
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7472471" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>Scientifically define "good." You'll find it's a subjective preference.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Inductive reasoning (although science might be considered a form of inductive reasoning). Deductive reasoning. Consensus building (for moral, social, and political issues, frex). Philosophy. And, no, the scientific method was designed to do hypothesis testing. There's nothing that prevents rather wild hypothesis.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What would your hypothesis be? "Science is the best tool to discover all truth?" What's the experiment? What's the conclusion? I'm saying it can't, all you have to do is prove it once and I'm wrong. Conversely, I cannot prove a negative. The burden here is on the side claiming it can define itself.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You're confusing subjective policy decisions with science, or are you trying to claim political parties are using science to determine which science research areas to defund? I'm certainly not at all claiming that politics cannot impact the priorities on where to spend money, I'm explicitly saying science cannot provide those priorities. Your statement above tends to agree with me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Mathematics is the language of science so it's hard to go from science improving mathematics. This is like saying Shakespeare made the English language better rather than just using it really damn well. Science hasn't weighed in, ever, on the golden rule. What would that experiment look like? Science avoids philosophy like the plague -- nothing to measure so how could you experiment?</p><p></p><p>Honestly, this is exactly the kind of pseudo-belief structure in science as the one true way to understanding I'm cautioning against. You've got your hammer and are looking for nails.</p><p></p><p>ETA: Again, I'm a <em>freaking engineer</em> (electronic, not trains). I love science. I use it every day. I read papers for fun. None of this is meant to attack science; it's a fantastic tool in the box for helping us understand our physical universe.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 7472471, member: 16814"] Scientifically define "good." You'll find it's a subjective preference. Inductive reasoning (although science might be considered a form of inductive reasoning). Deductive reasoning. Consensus building (for moral, social, and political issues, frex). Philosophy. And, no, the scientific method was designed to do hypothesis testing. There's nothing that prevents rather wild hypothesis. What would your hypothesis be? "Science is the best tool to discover all truth?" What's the experiment? What's the conclusion? I'm saying it can't, all you have to do is prove it once and I'm wrong. Conversely, I cannot prove a negative. The burden here is on the side claiming it can define itself. You're confusing subjective policy decisions with science, or are you trying to claim political parties are using science to determine which science research areas to defund? I'm certainly not at all claiming that politics cannot impact the priorities on where to spend money, I'm explicitly saying science cannot provide those priorities. Your statement above tends to agree with me. Mathematics is the language of science so it's hard to go from science improving mathematics. This is like saying Shakespeare made the English language better rather than just using it really damn well. Science hasn't weighed in, ever, on the golden rule. What would that experiment look like? Science avoids philosophy like the plague -- nothing to measure so how could you experiment? Honestly, this is exactly the kind of pseudo-belief structure in science as the one true way to understanding I'm cautioning against. You've got your hammer and are looking for nails. ETA: Again, I'm a [I]freaking engineer[/I] (electronic, not trains). I love science. I use it every day. I read papers for fun. None of this is meant to attack science; it's a fantastic tool in the box for helping us understand our physical universe. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A discussion of metagame concepts in game design
Top