Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7472603" data-attributes="member: 16814">Bafflegab.&nbsp; That's like saying this post contributes to the creation of English.I am not.&nbsp; I personally do not believe math is discovered, but I don't claim to be right on this matter -- there are other opinions.That's because I said science doesn't create new maths, it follows math.&nbsp; Changing the words could easily lead to confusion.No, it's not necessary -- we could all agree on something and still be objectively wrong.&nbsp; It is, however, extremely indicative of subjective definitions.&nbsp; Given you cannot show an objectively correct definition of good, I'm going to rest my case.&nbsp; Nice move of the pea -- I never said there was no possibility of objective truth, I said we're unable to objectively determine it.&nbsp; What I believe is good differs from every other persons' definition of good.&nbsp; Case in point, even the philosophers that share a general definition argue over particular instances.&nbsp; The existence of an objective truth does not mean we can know it.&nbsp; Then, for all human intents and purposes, there exists no objective definition.What is good is a question we've always had.&nbsp; We're no closer to the answer today.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 7472603, member: 16814"] Bafflegab. That's like saying this post contributes to the creation of English. I am not. I personally do not believe math is discovered, but I don't claim to be right on this matter -- there are other opinions. That's because I said science doesn't create new maths, it follows math. Changing the words could easily lead to confusion. No, it's not necessary -- we could all agree on something and still be objectively wrong. It is, however, extremely indicative of subjective definitions. Given you cannot show an objectively correct definition of good, I'm going to rest my case. Nice move of the pea -- I never said there was no possibility of objective truth, I said we're unable to objectively determine it. What I believe is good differs from every other persons' definition of good. Case in point, even the philosophers that share a general definition argue over particular instances. The existence of an objective truth does not mean we can know it. Then, for all human intents and purposes, there exists no objective definition. What is good is a question we've always had. We're no closer to the answer today. [/QUOTE]

Verification