Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A DM by any other name
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scylla" data-source="post: 5988520" data-attributes="member: 32833"><p>Agreed, ForeverSlayer (and thanks for bringing this thread back on point).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There's nothing here I disagree with. Sometimes you see something that's houseruled so often that it should be ruled, period. Example from 1e: Low M-U hit points. Everyone I knew thought starting a mage with 1 hp at 1st level was ridiculous, and most DMs & players gave max. points at 1st, or double the roll, or whatever.</p><p></p><p>I have no issue with rules. I have no issue with standardization. But rules in practice have consequences and side effects. </p><p></p><p>For example: For years I yearned for interesting fighter actions. (To the point that in my 20s I wrote up my own RPG and gave fighters a choice of "maneuvers" at each level—if you saw that game today, you'd see a frightening similarity to 4e.) In 4e I finally got what I wanted ... and combats slowed to a crawl. Adding the extra combat options had the side effect (along with inflated monster HPs and other things) of slowing combat. Rules are not bad things, but adding so many rules and options to D&D has had overall side effects, not all good.</p><p></p><p>I believe an overall side effect of abundant rules—over abundant at times—and endless PC combos has been a growth of metagaming and, for some, power gaming and sense of player entitlement. Not all players, of course, but a subset. Now these folks see D&D-Next as a lighter system with fewer options, and they dismay. Why? No more killer builds. </p><p>It's gamer nature to tinker with rules, and if you give folks more character options, they will play with them, combine them, etc. This isn't a bad thing usually, and character building can be great fun. But options can also be abused* and can lead to imbalance at the game table.</p><p></p><p>*The (mis)use of the spiked chain and endless-Trip combos in 3e are two easy examples.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scylla, post: 5988520, member: 32833"] Agreed, ForeverSlayer (and thanks for bringing this thread back on point). There's nothing here I disagree with. Sometimes you see something that's houseruled so often that it should be ruled, period. Example from 1e: Low M-U hit points. Everyone I knew thought starting a mage with 1 hp at 1st level was ridiculous, and most DMs & players gave max. points at 1st, or double the roll, or whatever. I have no issue with rules. I have no issue with standardization. But rules in practice have consequences and side effects. For example: For years I yearned for interesting fighter actions. (To the point that in my 20s I wrote up my own RPG and gave fighters a choice of "maneuvers" at each level—if you saw that game today, you'd see a frightening similarity to 4e.) In 4e I finally got what I wanted ... and combats slowed to a crawl. Adding the extra combat options had the side effect (along with inflated monster HPs and other things) of slowing combat. Rules are not bad things, but adding so many rules and options to D&D has had overall side effects, not all good. I believe an overall side effect of abundant rules—over abundant at times—and endless PC combos has been a growth of metagaming and, for some, power gaming and sense of player entitlement. Not all players, of course, but a subset. Now these folks see D&D-Next as a lighter system with fewer options, and they dismay. Why? No more killer builds. It's gamer nature to tinker with rules, and if you give folks more character options, they will play with them, combine them, etc. This isn't a bad thing usually, and character building can be great fun. But options can also be abused* and can lead to imbalance at the game table. *The (mis)use of the spiked chain and endless-Trip combos in 3e are two easy examples. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A DM by any other name
Top