Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A DMG for all of us
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Loren the GM" data-source="post: 9511954" data-attributes="member: 6882721"><p>It is not bad advice, it is just how you are choosing to play. It would be bad for your table to use this optional way of playing, as it would obviously not be fun for you.</p><p></p><p>While I am a "roll in the open" sort of DM, I make this very clear during my session 0 (I'm not pulling punches, and stuff is going to happen how it happens). If I were going to be a "roll behind the screen and keep my rolls secret" sort of DM, I would also make this clear during my session 0, and explain what that could mean (such as my ability to fudge rolls). Either way it would be a discussion, and the opinions of the other players would be part of the equation going forward. </p><p></p><p>Some groups like having a DM who is guiding the story more through rolls, some like it less, and some do not care and are just happy to be playing. I've played with all of those groups, and have adjusted my style to fit them. All are fair ways of playing, because everyone has agreed to it.</p><p></p><p>Which is also how the 2024 DMG is laid out - providing options (including discussing game rules, etc.) during a Session 0, and having a conversation for the fun of the group.</p><p></p><p>None of this equals bad advice or the wrong way to play. And saying it shouldn't be in the DMG is kind of the equivalent of policing how someone else has fun with the game, and that there is only one right way to play. There isn't just one way to play or have fun, and the DMG is very clear that there are lots of approaches, as long as everyone at the table is bought into how the game is played.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Loren the GM, post: 9511954, member: 6882721"] It is not bad advice, it is just how you are choosing to play. It would be bad for your table to use this optional way of playing, as it would obviously not be fun for you. While I am a "roll in the open" sort of DM, I make this very clear during my session 0 (I'm not pulling punches, and stuff is going to happen how it happens). If I were going to be a "roll behind the screen and keep my rolls secret" sort of DM, I would also make this clear during my session 0, and explain what that could mean (such as my ability to fudge rolls). Either way it would be a discussion, and the opinions of the other players would be part of the equation going forward. Some groups like having a DM who is guiding the story more through rolls, some like it less, and some do not care and are just happy to be playing. I've played with all of those groups, and have adjusted my style to fit them. All are fair ways of playing, because everyone has agreed to it. Which is also how the 2024 DMG is laid out - providing options (including discussing game rules, etc.) during a Session 0, and having a conversation for the fun of the group. None of this equals bad advice or the wrong way to play. And saying it shouldn't be in the DMG is kind of the equivalent of policing how someone else has fun with the game, and that there is only one right way to play. There isn't just one way to play or have fun, and the DMG is very clear that there are lots of approaches, as long as everyone at the table is bought into how the game is played. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A DMG for all of us
Top