Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sir_Darien" data-source="post: 4214201" data-attributes="member: 62164">Glad to hear people are at least giving the game a fair shake before passing judgement.A couple questions:1. I too have my doubts about the "streamlined" nature of 4e. IMO it seems that you'll just be tracking small incremental bonuses and penalties instead of the stack of buff spells like you currently do in 3.5. That being said, it seems to me that the complexity level of 4e does not rise as sharply as 3e-3.5 as you go up in level. Did you feel that playing the low-level game you did was more or less complex than playing a 3.5 game around level 8-10?2. When you're talking about GM issues you seem to say that if you didn't have a good one, you wouldn't have enjoyed your experience. It has been my experience that this is the case for any roleplaying system. Bad GM = Bad Game. Are you just echoing this philosophy, or do you believe that a DM has to be "better" to run an enjoyable 4e game than an enjoyable 3e-3.5 one?Thanks for an honest review, and good gaming in whatever edition you decide is best for you.</blockquote>