Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Cor_Malek" data-source="post: 5338934" data-attributes="member: 91608">Um... No, they don't? I know it's bad form, and I should provide quotation, but I feel that I'd have to re-quote about half of posts here (possibly more, I think majority was at &quot;Ney!&quot;).Some, me included, pressed the idea that this combination wouldn't be against the rules. This idea, met a lot of counterarguments that even if we twist the meaning of RAW (&quot;what is life, etc&quot;), the sheer amount of those rules and how they were repeated over the years and editions, make it clear what are RAI in this matter.They either didn't touch the &quot;but would you allow it?&quot; Or admitted they indeed would. They would just consider it as houseruling. It was perhaps most explicitly written by Hussar. Reread his latest posts.↓(Emphasis mine)↓So for at least one or two last pages it's a strange discussion where two arguments are: &quot;Well it's clearly against a lot of rules in their RAW and RAI form &lt;insert quotes&gt;&quot;. vs &quot;I'd use Rule of Cool and justify it because &lt;insert some ideas&gt;&quot; I'd say that there are two discussions here ATM, and that both have reached consensus. How about we call it a day, then?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Cor_Malek, post: 5338934, member: 91608"] Um... No, they don't? I know it's bad form, and I should provide quotation, but I feel that I'd have to re-quote about half of posts here (possibly more, I think majority was at "Ney!"). Some, me included, pressed the idea that this combination wouldn't [I]be[/I] against the rules. This idea, met a lot of counterarguments that even if we twist the meaning of RAW ("what is life, etc"), the sheer amount of those rules and how they were repeated over the years and editions, make it clear what are RAI in this matter. They either didn't touch the "but would you allow it?" Or admitted they indeed would. They would just consider it as houseruling. It was perhaps most explicitly written by Hussar. Reread his latest posts. [SIZE=1]↓(Emphasis mine)[/SIZE]↓ So for at least one or two last pages it's a strange discussion where two arguments are: "Well it's clearly against a lot of rules in their RAW and RAI form <insert quotes>". vs "I'd use Rule of Cool and justify it because <insert some ideas>" I'd say that there are two discussions here ATM, and that both have reached consensus. How about we call it a day, then? [/QUOTE]

Verification