Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Daedrova" data-source="post: 904298" data-attributes="member: 11835">fides quaerens intellectum "Faith seeking understanding"; credo ut intelligam: "I believe in order that I may understand."  Many philosophers and I would disagree with your statement Ranger REG.  Faith does begin where logic must end.  Some things can not be known, and for that, faith exists.  We all have faith, wheather regarding religion or not.  (Do you believe you have the ability to reason?- you must believe it, therefore you have faith) Logic will tell us if it can be true.  A belief, faith, or system that does not follow reason/is self-contradictory can not be true (violation of the law of non-contradiction identifies any such "thing" or idea as not true), and belieif in such a thing is faith misplaced.  There are many things that Can be true (logically), but can not be known in certainty to be true, and so we place faith in them.  (I would recomend reading of Aquinas or Pascal, or more recently Kreeft or Tacelli for more on this.)For a druids belief system, the weapon restrictions as presented do seem a bit inconsistant, but could be explained, with reason (as was done at the start of this thread [by the way, good job Ferret, but as we see, there are still a few things there that would need altered or better explained]) as to why they existed in such a manner.  And I must agree that we need to see some revision to the Druid weapon restiriction list and some more logically consistant explinations as to why those restrictions exist as they do.fides quaerens intellectum; credo ut intelligam-Daedrova</blockquote>

Verification