Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Far Out Rant
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rounser" data-source="post: 3453089" data-attributes="member: 1106"><p>Only:</p><p>1) Cthulhu's a creature, and therefore subject to classification by alignment in D&D.</p><p>2) It's no accident that Cthulhu's designed specifically to hurt people.</p><p></p><p>I think point (2) takes away Cthulhu's right to immunity of intention towards evil in the same way, say, the smallpox virus has. Evolution might have designed the smallpox virus as being uncaring and predictably malignant towards humans, whereas an author who does the same sets out specifically to create a monster - the uncaringness is just flavour.</p><p></p><p>I'll admit that this is inconsistent - isn't a rot grub neutral, and predictably malignant? Yes, but perhaps it falls under the animal clause because it's of animal intelligence, and resembles an animal. Cthulhu, on the other hand, schemes towards his malignant effect, and I think we associate malignancy + intelligence with wickedness.</p><p></p><p>This is subjective, but then, morality itself is inconsistent. One example I've seen repeated recently is the following scenarios:</p><p></p><p>1) "You and an obese guy are on a train speeding towards 5 people on the track who cannot get off. You have the option to flick a switch and divert the train to another track where only 1 person is trapped, killing them rather than the 5. Do you flick the switch?"</p><p></p><p>2) "You and an obese guy are on a train speeding towards 5 people on the track who cannot get off. There is no switch and alternate track this time. You could push the obese guy off the front of the train, which would slow it enough to save the 5 people but kill him. Do you push him off?"</p><p></p><p>Given that most people don't hesitate to flick the switch in the first instance, but cannot bring themselves to push the obese guy off in the second suggests that morality cannot be approached in terms of logic, only in terms of human idiosyncracy. Mine tells me that Cthulhu is evil because I know what the true story purpose of his creation was, and he resembles a devil more than an animal. The tipping point for me is that he schemes against humanity, and thus cannot fall back on low intelligence as an excuse for his actions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rounser, post: 3453089, member: 1106"] Only: 1) Cthulhu's a creature, and therefore subject to classification by alignment in D&D. 2) It's no accident that Cthulhu's designed specifically to hurt people. I think point (2) takes away Cthulhu's right to immunity of intention towards evil in the same way, say, the smallpox virus has. Evolution might have designed the smallpox virus as being uncaring and predictably malignant towards humans, whereas an author who does the same sets out specifically to create a monster - the uncaringness is just flavour. I'll admit that this is inconsistent - isn't a rot grub neutral, and predictably malignant? Yes, but perhaps it falls under the animal clause because it's of animal intelligence, and resembles an animal. Cthulhu, on the other hand, schemes towards his malignant effect, and I think we associate malignancy + intelligence with wickedness. This is subjective, but then, morality itself is inconsistent. One example I've seen repeated recently is the following scenarios: 1) "You and an obese guy are on a train speeding towards 5 people on the track who cannot get off. You have the option to flick a switch and divert the train to another track where only 1 person is trapped, killing them rather than the 5. Do you flick the switch?" 2) "You and an obese guy are on a train speeding towards 5 people on the track who cannot get off. There is no switch and alternate track this time. You could push the obese guy off the front of the train, which would slow it enough to save the 5 people but kill him. Do you push him off?" Given that most people don't hesitate to flick the switch in the first instance, but cannot bring themselves to push the obese guy off in the second suggests that morality cannot be approached in terms of logic, only in terms of human idiosyncracy. Mine tells me that Cthulhu is evil because I know what the true story purpose of his creation was, and he resembles a devil more than an animal. The tipping point for me is that he schemes against humanity, and thus cannot fall back on low intelligence as an excuse for his actions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
A Far Out Rant
Top