Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A few basic rules questions...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kae'Yoss" data-source="post: 308698" data-attributes="member: 4134"><p>Well, you either increase the skill points per level, OR you introduce "skill osmosis", but not both. I'm for the first one, cause so I can still play an inattentive, naive fighter and use the (extra) skill points for other things. 3e is for possiblities, and I think rules changes should support this.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>They did that because they wanted you to be able to customize your character as much as possible. But they're aware of the problem, and the DMG deals with that, giving the advice (for those DM's that don't think of it themselves) that the DM requires the players to actually use the skills he improves: he should note what skills he uses often, and what skills he doesn't use at all, and next time he levels up, he can rule that he can't upgrade that skill (you could even go that far that you let him upgrade it only by one point next time, even if he used it between the level-ups. Only if he uses it excessively, he can max it out again)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Some people never learn, and that's a fact. Also, there's a limit on how much you can learn in a given time span, and that is given in the limit of skill points per level. </p><p>If you increased all the skills he used, there could be a lot of abuse: a stupid (Int 8 fighter) who searches every single room he encounters, tries to bluff every single person he meets, climbing up a wall even if they're stairs, spending nights putting a plank on two bricks and tiptoing along them. Add to that the stuff that happens "automatically" like sense motive for every single dialogue and search and spot all the time, and he will demand 7 skills to be increased (most of which are cross class), while he could only increase one by the rules (and only if it ain't cross class).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The DM can surely demand that you show genuine interest in the doings of a class long before you multiclass (i.e. if your wizard5 wants to be a wizard5/fighter1, he has to start taking fighting exercise as soon as he becomes wiz5).</p><p></p><p>The Star Wars D20 roleplaying game has a interesting way to deal with that particular problem (multiclass to scrounge free feats): Every class has a list of starting feats which usually includes the weapon proficiencies. For excample, the Jedi Consular gets Exotic Weapon Proficiency(lightsaber), Force Sensitive, Weapon Group Proficiency (blaster pistols) and Weapon Group Proficiency (simple weapons) as starting feats. If you choose that class at 1st character level, you gain all them feats, but if you multiclass into it, you gain only one of those feats (your choice). So no taking one class of soldier to receive Armor Proficiency(light) and proficiency in 5 weapon groups.</p><p>This could be adapted for D&D as well, but it would cause problems with the requirements of certain PrC's....</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Maybe the character trained the skill before he used it on adventure. This goes great with games where you have to train to gain a level. But honestly, I don't like the obligation to train for a level-up.</p><p></p><p>If you are the DM and have problems with that, you can always rule that players have to use the things before they can improve them on level-up, but in some cases you should allow them to train in some save environment (no master stuntman became a master stuntman because they trained by pulling of the most dangerous stunts right away)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kae'Yoss, post: 308698, member: 4134"] Well, you either increase the skill points per level, OR you introduce "skill osmosis", but not both. I'm for the first one, cause so I can still play an inattentive, naive fighter and use the (extra) skill points for other things. 3e is for possiblities, and I think rules changes should support this. They did that because they wanted you to be able to customize your character as much as possible. But they're aware of the problem, and the DMG deals with that, giving the advice (for those DM's that don't think of it themselves) that the DM requires the players to actually use the skills he improves: he should note what skills he uses often, and what skills he doesn't use at all, and next time he levels up, he can rule that he can't upgrade that skill (you could even go that far that you let him upgrade it only by one point next time, even if he used it between the level-ups. Only if he uses it excessively, he can max it out again) Some people never learn, and that's a fact. Also, there's a limit on how much you can learn in a given time span, and that is given in the limit of skill points per level. If you increased all the skills he used, there could be a lot of abuse: a stupid (Int 8 fighter) who searches every single room he encounters, tries to bluff every single person he meets, climbing up a wall even if they're stairs, spending nights putting a plank on two bricks and tiptoing along them. Add to that the stuff that happens "automatically" like sense motive for every single dialogue and search and spot all the time, and he will demand 7 skills to be increased (most of which are cross class), while he could only increase one by the rules (and only if it ain't cross class). The DM can surely demand that you show genuine interest in the doings of a class long before you multiclass (i.e. if your wizard5 wants to be a wizard5/fighter1, he has to start taking fighting exercise as soon as he becomes wiz5). The Star Wars D20 roleplaying game has a interesting way to deal with that particular problem (multiclass to scrounge free feats): Every class has a list of starting feats which usually includes the weapon proficiencies. For excample, the Jedi Consular gets Exotic Weapon Proficiency(lightsaber), Force Sensitive, Weapon Group Proficiency (blaster pistols) and Weapon Group Proficiency (simple weapons) as starting feats. If you choose that class at 1st character level, you gain all them feats, but if you multiclass into it, you gain only one of those feats (your choice). So no taking one class of soldier to receive Armor Proficiency(light) and proficiency in 5 weapon groups. This could be adapted for D&D as well, but it would cause problems with the requirements of certain PrC's.... Maybe the character trained the skill before he used it on adventure. This goes great with games where you have to train to gain a level. But honestly, I don't like the obligation to train for a level-up. If you are the DM and have problems with that, you can always rule that players have to use the things before they can improve them on level-up, but in some cases you should allow them to train in some save environment (no master stuntman became a master stuntman because they trained by pulling of the most dangerous stunts right away) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A few basic rules questions...
Top