Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A few questions regarding Charging (Pounce) and multiple attacks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pielorinho" data-source="post: 3022011" data-attributes="member: 259"><p>Set aside the pounce feat for a moment, and just look at the name: "pounce" implies that you run toward a creature and then, well, <strong>pounce</strong> it. You're able to attack with all your natural weapons because you're doing so midair, simultaneously, before you hit the ground. Watch how a cat pounces a victim to get an idea of what using the feat should look like. Note that the cat doesn't bite (make a single attack) <strong>prior</strong> to its pounce onto the victim.</p><p></p><p>As such, I've got no problem at all allowing the +2 to the charge to apply to all the attacks: the +2 comes from the charge's forward movement, and the entire cat is moving forward at the same rate. If that cat somehow benefits from spirited charge, in which the charger moves forward even more powerfully, I'd have no problem allowing spirited charge to apply to all the attacks either.</p><p></p><p>Now look at the pounce feat again. Apparently, it allows the user to take <strong>iterative</strong> attacks at the end of a charge. I'm not sure what that would look like, but it certainly wouldn't look anything like a pounce. </p><p></p><p>My suggestion? Rename the feat and divorce it from the charge ability. Keep the pounce ability as a charge that ends with a full attack instead of a single attack.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pielorinho, post: 3022011, member: 259"] Set aside the pounce feat for a moment, and just look at the name: "pounce" implies that you run toward a creature and then, well, [b]pounce[/b] it. You're able to attack with all your natural weapons because you're doing so midair, simultaneously, before you hit the ground. Watch how a cat pounces a victim to get an idea of what using the feat should look like. Note that the cat doesn't bite (make a single attack) [b]prior[/b] to its pounce onto the victim. As such, I've got no problem at all allowing the +2 to the charge to apply to all the attacks: the +2 comes from the charge's forward movement, and the entire cat is moving forward at the same rate. If that cat somehow benefits from spirited charge, in which the charger moves forward even more powerfully, I'd have no problem allowing spirited charge to apply to all the attacks either. Now look at the pounce feat again. Apparently, it allows the user to take [b]iterative[/b] attacks at the end of a charge. I'm not sure what that would look like, but it certainly wouldn't look anything like a pounce. My suggestion? Rename the feat and divorce it from the charge ability. Keep the pounce ability as a charge that ends with a full attack instead of a single attack. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A few questions regarding Charging (Pounce) and multiple attacks
Top