Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A Fighters skill points....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The_DarkAngel" data-source="post: 1133037" data-attributes="member: 14194"><p>Thats a good retort Humanophile, thank u. Also, on another note sense so many peeps want to talk baout the "role-playing" side of the fighter. Were the hell are the "kits". I thought they were aweseome (old 2e). Prestige classes are ok, and in rare instances they may be a place for a few of them but, kits make more sense to me, and are more usable at low levels as well.</p><p></p><p>Problem is the ol' Wotc boys arent fond of giving characters any disadvantage anymore. Which in roleplaying value wise, it sucks.</p><p></p><p>By the way, when peeps consider saying "oh the fighter is only good at fighting and he dont need skill points because its unbalancing" to other classes, I'd also like to know which classes. The Ranger and Bard are more threating to the Thief in regaurds to "skill points". Some classes are very good at a few things. Rangers are great at skills, great at Fighting, and can dable in spells. Wizards are excellent at fighting but they can pick and choose spells for almost any enviorment. Fighters are excellent in fighting (thats it). A skill boost to 4 and no additional core classes is hardly unfair (unless u can prove otherwise).</p><p></p><p>DA</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The_DarkAngel, post: 1133037, member: 14194"] Thats a good retort Humanophile, thank u. Also, on another note sense so many peeps want to talk baout the "role-playing" side of the fighter. Were the hell are the "kits". I thought they were aweseome (old 2e). Prestige classes are ok, and in rare instances they may be a place for a few of them but, kits make more sense to me, and are more usable at low levels as well. Problem is the ol' Wotc boys arent fond of giving characters any disadvantage anymore. Which in roleplaying value wise, it sucks. By the way, when peeps consider saying "oh the fighter is only good at fighting and he dont need skill points because its unbalancing" to other classes, I'd also like to know which classes. The Ranger and Bard are more threating to the Thief in regaurds to "skill points". Some classes are very good at a few things. Rangers are great at skills, great at Fighting, and can dable in spells. Wizards are excellent at fighting but they can pick and choose spells for almost any enviorment. Fighters are excellent in fighting (thats it). A skill boost to 4 and no additional core classes is hardly unfair (unless u can prove otherwise). DA [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A Fighters skill points....
Top