Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="dcollins" data-source="post: 1134442" data-attributes="member: 876">God forbid I get involved with this one, but... yes, a number of point-evaluation schemes for base classes have been developed in the past few years. For example, here's one that's been made available for some time by "Shadowcraft Studios":<a href="http://www.community3e.com/dn/class/class_d20cce.pdf" target="_blank">www.community3e.com/dn/class/class_d20cce.pdf</a>In this system's evaluation, Fighters are just barely below the mean: they are rated above Clerics, Rangers, Sorcerers, and Wizards, equal to Barbarians. They are rated below Bards, Druids, Monks, Paladins, and Rogues. Of course this could be argued, but that brings me to my point. Someone asserting that the point-system they're still working on will definitively prove Fighters to be underpowered is suffering from a spot of egomania.</blockquote>