Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A Fighters skill points....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ketjak" data-source="post: 1142729" data-attributes="member: 1083"><p>Your statement is as valid for Fighters as it is for Rangers or any other combat class. The levels at which Fighters have two or more combat styles either mastered or under development mandate the use of magic for all classes. For what it's worth, by tenth level the Fighter has all the combat feats/style of a Ranger-archer and is on his way to Whirlwind Attack. If the Ranger has chosen TWF path and the Fighter is emulating the Ranger, the Fighter has Whirlwind attack. Putting everything they have into it, Rangers get Whirlwind attack at 15th level.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is a factually incorrect statement, including Takyris' statement about Rangers being better than Fighters at their chosen path (except for one occasion at 11th level). <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> All respect is given to all participants in the following paragraphs!</p><p></p><p>First, the Ranger is not better than the Fighter at the combat style he chooses except at 11th level. The Fighter achieves superiority again at 12 th level, and his damage output never wavers. If the Fighter specialized in the same weapons as the Ranger, the Ranger is only barely better than the Fighter at - and <em>only</em> at - 11th level. </p><p></p><p>Second, each of those classes gets a narrow-band benefit pending the existence of certain conditions (raging, versus twice-favored enemy at 11th level, target is flanked and not immune to critical hits or sneak attacks). While those conditions exist, it is possible they're doing more damage than a Fighter. Groovy for them! When those conditions don't exist (<em>calm emotion</em> spell or after rage, in any combat besides with a favored enemy, or against undead/constructs/oozes/uncanny dodgers), the Fighter continues tearing down the bad guys.</p><p></p><p>A benefit that provides a bonus in a narrow range of situations is worth less than a benefit that provides the same benefit across a wide range - or all - situations. To be equal, the narrow benefit should be greater than the wide benefit. Of all the narrow-benefit warrior types, the Barbarian is about equal and only the Fighter's diversity in technique makes the Barbarian his marginal, but arguable, inferior in combat.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't recall seeing those in the PHB or another WotC prodct. I don't own them all, though - can you tell me where I can find them?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Favored enemy is not worth three feats. Though it provides +2 to five skills (normally worth 2.5 feats) and the equivalent of Weapon Specialization with all weapons (1 feat), these effects are only useful against one category or sub-category of opponents. The skill bonuses are at best worth half that value, and more likely less. The Weapon Specialization bonus benefit is canceled out by the restrictive nature of the ability, so it's probably 1 feat. A minor quibble.</p><p></p><p>Hide in Plain Sight is arguably the best of the other features. While it allows the Ranger to use Hide skill, he can only use it in restricted conditions ("natural terrain"). Still, it's quite useful.</p><p></p><p>Each of the other abilities the Ranger gets is <em>non-combat</em>, and is <u>not worth the same as combat abilities</u> considering the orientation of the core rules and in context with them. Individual campaigns may vary as Takyris described, and that's wonderful to see. In heavily political games, the Fighter is not as useful as the Rogue or Bard, or even the Cleric. <em>The class was not designed to be.</em></p><p></p><p>Fighters don't need skill points or more magic than any other class. They get combat feat versatility, making them the master at combat. They don't do as much damage as the Barbarian does when he's raging, which does not happen all the time. The Ranger must choose the same enemy two, then three, times to keep up with damage output, but he's out-fought by the Fighter against enemies of another type. The Rogue must be in position, probably behind enemy lines to use his ability.</p><p></p><p>The Fighter needs a weapon to use most of his abilities. That's it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em>[edit: fixed a spelling error]</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ketjak, post: 1142729, member: 1083"] Your statement is as valid for Fighters as it is for Rangers or any other combat class. The levels at which Fighters have two or more combat styles either mastered or under development mandate the use of magic for all classes. For what it's worth, by tenth level the Fighter has all the combat feats/style of a Ranger-archer and is on his way to Whirlwind Attack. If the Ranger has chosen TWF path and the Fighter is emulating the Ranger, the Fighter has Whirlwind attack. Putting everything they have into it, Rangers get Whirlwind attack at 15th level. This is a factually incorrect statement, including Takyris' statement about Rangers being better than Fighters at their chosen path (except for one occasion at 11th level). :) All respect is given to all participants in the following paragraphs! First, the Ranger is not better than the Fighter at the combat style he chooses except at 11th level. The Fighter achieves superiority again at 12 th level, and his damage output never wavers. If the Fighter specialized in the same weapons as the Ranger, the Ranger is only barely better than the Fighter at - and [i]only[/i] at - 11th level. Second, each of those classes gets a narrow-band benefit pending the existence of certain conditions (raging, versus twice-favored enemy at 11th level, target is flanked and not immune to critical hits or sneak attacks). While those conditions exist, it is possible they're doing more damage than a Fighter. Groovy for them! When those conditions don't exist ([i]calm emotion[/i] spell or after rage, in any combat besides with a favored enemy, or against undead/constructs/oozes/uncanny dodgers), the Fighter continues tearing down the bad guys. A benefit that provides a bonus in a narrow range of situations is worth less than a benefit that provides the same benefit across a wide range - or all - situations. To be equal, the narrow benefit should be greater than the wide benefit. Of all the narrow-benefit warrior types, the Barbarian is about equal and only the Fighter's diversity in technique makes the Barbarian his marginal, but arguable, inferior in combat. I don't recall seeing those in the PHB or another WotC prodct. I don't own them all, though - can you tell me where I can find them? Favored enemy is not worth three feats. Though it provides +2 to five skills (normally worth 2.5 feats) and the equivalent of Weapon Specialization with all weapons (1 feat), these effects are only useful against one category or sub-category of opponents. The skill bonuses are at best worth half that value, and more likely less. The Weapon Specialization bonus benefit is canceled out by the restrictive nature of the ability, so it's probably 1 feat. A minor quibble. Hide in Plain Sight is arguably the best of the other features. While it allows the Ranger to use Hide skill, he can only use it in restricted conditions ("natural terrain"). Still, it's quite useful. Each of the other abilities the Ranger gets is [i]non-combat[/i], and is [u]not worth the same as combat abilities[/u] considering the orientation of the core rules and in context with them. Individual campaigns may vary as Takyris described, and that's wonderful to see. In heavily political games, the Fighter is not as useful as the Rogue or Bard, or even the Cleric. [i]The class was not designed to be.[/i] Fighters don't need skill points or more magic than any other class. They get combat feat versatility, making them the master at combat. They don't do as much damage as the Barbarian does when he's raging, which does not happen all the time. The Ranger must choose the same enemy two, then three, times to keep up with damage output, but he's out-fought by the Fighter against enemies of another type. The Rogue must be in position, probably behind enemy lines to use his ability. The Fighter needs a weapon to use most of his abilities. That's it. [i][edit: fixed a spelling error][/i] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A Fighters skill points....
Top