Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A Fighters skill points....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrankTrollman" data-source="post: 1150318" data-attributes="member: 14225"><p>Yeah... go back and see the Rock Paper Scissors example.</p><p></p><p>I have seen more than one set-up where people made a Fighter specifically to beat <em>a</em> Barbarian. Similarly, you can make a Ranger, Paladin, or Barbarian to beat <em>a</em> Fighter. Neither proves anything.</p><p></p><p>The point is, that you can make a character with no more than 2 levels of Fighter who fills a straight Fighter's niche in the party <em>better</em>.</p><p></p><p>Just like my Cleric Archer is <em>better</em> than a Fighter Archer - a Barbarian can be a better Greatswordsman, a Paladin can be a <em>better</em> mounted lancer, and a Ranger can be a <em>better</em> multi-purpose diverse situations combatant.</p><p></p><p>The Fighter can be outshined by <em>a</em> build at anything he attempts to put his mind to. And therefore, he's underpowered. A character class, taken exclusively, should be better than any other combination of core classes at <em>something</em> - and for the Fighter that just is not true.</p><p></p><p>BTW: The Paladin really shines in Defensive builds - having an extra +3 (or more) to all saves is a really big deal to a defensive charcater. Not everything is going to attempt attack rolls against you, and the Paladin has more over-all staying power than any Fighter build does.</p><p></p><p>----</p><p></p><p>As to Wizards and multiclassing - yes. Multiclassing for spellcasters sucks, and something should be done about that. That is for another topic, however. As things currently stand, however, our massively multiclassed Fighter/Ranger/Barbarian, while he outshines the straight Fighter in all things - does not actually outshine a Wizard of equal character level in all combats.</p><p></p><p>A Wizard is always going to do better against huge numbers of weak opponents (area damage, and all that) - and often performs better against single powerful opponents (With Save or Die spells). So while the multiclassed spellcaster needs rules alterations to bring them up to speed with <em>single classed</em> spellcasters - the single classed spellcasters wants for nothing in his ability to actually compete with multiclassed warriors.</p><p></p><p>-Frank</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrankTrollman, post: 1150318, member: 14225"] Yeah... go back and see the Rock Paper Scissors example. I have seen more than one set-up where people made a Fighter specifically to beat [i]a[/i] Barbarian. Similarly, you can make a Ranger, Paladin, or Barbarian to beat [i]a[/i] Fighter. Neither proves anything. The point is, that you can make a character with no more than 2 levels of Fighter who fills a straight Fighter's niche in the party [i]better[/i]. Just like my Cleric Archer is [i]better[/i] than a Fighter Archer - a Barbarian can be a better Greatswordsman, a Paladin can be a [i]better[/i] mounted lancer, and a Ranger can be a [i]better[/i] multi-purpose diverse situations combatant. The Fighter can be outshined by [i]a[/i] build at anything he attempts to put his mind to. And therefore, he's underpowered. A character class, taken exclusively, should be better than any other combination of core classes at [i]something[/i] - and for the Fighter that just is not true. BTW: The Paladin really shines in Defensive builds - having an extra +3 (or more) to all saves is a really big deal to a defensive charcater. Not everything is going to attempt attack rolls against you, and the Paladin has more over-all staying power than any Fighter build does. ---- As to Wizards and multiclassing - yes. Multiclassing for spellcasters sucks, and something should be done about that. That is for another topic, however. As things currently stand, however, our massively multiclassed Fighter/Ranger/Barbarian, while he outshines the straight Fighter in all things - does not actually outshine a Wizard of equal character level in all combats. A Wizard is always going to do better against huge numbers of weak opponents (area damage, and all that) - and often performs better against single powerful opponents (With Save or Die spells). So while the multiclassed spellcaster needs rules alterations to bring them up to speed with [i]single classed[/i] spellcasters - the single classed spellcasters wants for nothing in his ability to actually compete with multiclassed warriors. -Frank [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
A Fighters skill points....
Top