Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lyxen" data-source="post: 8378498" data-attributes="member: 7032025">I agree. For me it's the same thing as the really completely stupid gloomstalker feature &quot;umbral sight&quot; which is much too strong.I have a tendency not to use house rules in 5e (in 3e we had pages and pages of house rules which were a pain to write and to maintain with new publications and it made it harder to move from table to table depending on a DM's preference), so I will probably not use your tweak, but it seems an interesting one (apart from the fact that I don't like fixed bonus in 5e, they interfere badly with bounded accuracy especially if they are large, but that's a feature of the original power anyway).Just one comment, +10 to stealth is really a huge bonus, I would suggest, if you make it longer lasting and &quot;renewable&quot; to lower it to +5 after you move the first time. It's already very strong, and you could even change it to advantage to stop interfering with BA.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lyxen, post: 8378498, member: 7032025"] I agree. For me it's the same thing as the really completely stupid gloomstalker feature "umbral sight" which is much too strong. I have a tendency not to use house rules in 5e (in 3e we had pages and pages of house rules which were a pain to write and to maintain with new publications and it made it harder to move from table to table depending on a DM's preference), so I will probably not use your tweak, but it seems an interesting one (apart from the fact that I don't like fixed bonus in 5e, they interfere badly with bounded accuracy especially if they are large, but that's a feature of the original power anyway). Just one comment, +10 to stealth is really a huge bonus, I would suggest, if you make it longer lasting and "renewable" to lower it to +5 after you move the first time. It's already very strong, and you could even change it to advantage to stop interfering with BA. [/QUOTE]

Verification