Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition (A5E)
A Fix(?) For Rural Stronghold Pricing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ondath" data-source="post: 8920212" data-attributes="member: 7031770"><p>Hey all!</p><p></p><p>This is something that's been bugging me for a while, but I crunched the numbers only recently so I'm hoping to get feedback — either from those who use the A5E rules, or hopefully the ones who designed the Stronghold rules themselves!</p><p></p><p>Thing is, there is a clear discrepancy between Rural Strongholds and Buildings when it comes to bang for your buck, and I'm not sure if this was intentional. <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/is-the-discrepancy-between-building-and-rural-strongholds-intentional.690091/" target="_blank">I made a thread about it way back in July</a>, but I got tumbleweeds in response, so hopefully the discussion can be slightly more lively now that I can contribute something to the table.</p><p></p><p><strong>If You Go Rural, You're Getting Scammed</strong></p><p>So, when you build a Stronghold in Level Up, the costs depend on the stronghold's size. For Buildings, each square foot of building costs 1 gp. For Rural Strongholds, each acre costs 500 gp. For prices in the middle, paying the same amount of gold gives you a Stronghold of equal Grade: 500 gold qualifies either for a Grade 1 Building a Grade 1 Rural Stronghold, 7500 gold for a Grade 3 Building or a Grade 3 Rural Stronghold, etc...</p><p></p><p>But, at the highest and lowest costs for each Grade, Rural Strongholds are simply a bad bargain. Take the Stronghold pricing table in Adventurer's Guide (as well as the a5e.tools website, <a href="https://a5e.tools/rules/building-stronghold" target="_blank">here</a>), flip the scale so that it shows not Stronghold area but Stronghold cost thresholds for each Grade, and the pattern becomes obvious:</p><p></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td><strong>Grade</strong></td><td><strong>Building Price</strong></td><td><strong>Rural Stronghold Price</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>100-1000 gp</td><td><strong>500</strong>-<strong>2500 </strong>gp</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1001-5000 gp</td><td><strong>3000</strong>-5000 gp</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>5001-10000 gp</td><td>5500-10000 gp</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>10001-25000 gp</td><td>10500-<strong>30000</strong> gp</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>25001-50000 gp</td><td><strong>30500</strong>-<strong>60000</strong> gp</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>50001-100000 gp</td><td><strong>60500</strong>-<strong>125000</strong> gp</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>100001-250000 gp</td><td><strong>125500</strong>-<strong>300000</strong> gp</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>250001+ gp</td><td><strong>300000+</strong> gp</td></tr></table><p></p><p>In each bolded price point, Rural Strongholds give you less for more. Some of this is due to the 500-gold increments, but most of it is not: 2500 gp gives you a mid-sized Grade 2 Building, but for Rural Strongholds it stays at Grade 1. 28000 gold pieces would get you a Grade 5 Building, but only a Grade 4 Rural Stronghold, and 55000 gp gets you a Grade 6 Building while the Rural Stronghold still lags at Grade 5.</p><p></p><p>This goes beyond the base pricing, too. Rural Strongholds also get fewer staff members when they increase their Furnishing and Staff quality.</p><p></p><p><strong>Is This Intentional</strong>?</p><p>Given the evident pattern where Rural Strongholds need to pay more both for their base construction and for their furshing and staff, I can't help but wonder if this was a conscious choice. Maybe a simulationist decision made to represent the difficulty of maintaining an open area compared to plopping a building inside a city. Maybe a game design concern in order to balance the stronger features of Rural Strongholds. However, I see nothing that points to these:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If this were a simulation/flavour decision, I imagine there would be some reasoning given in the section on Strongholds that explained the price discrepancy within the game universe's rules. Something like "Unlike obtaining the lease for a small building inside a city and building your Stronghold there, maintaining a large swath of land as your Stronghold is costly. This is why PCs planning to build Rural Strongholds should be prepared to pay a higher premium." But no such text is in the Strongholds section.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The reason I doubt it's a balance decision is the fact that some Strongholds can be either Rural or a Building. This means you can get the benefits of say, a Menagerie, in either form. In such a case, Building it as a Building is the obvious superior option, and if balance were of concern, the Rural version of a Menagerie would probably give some benefit to offset this. Furthermore, other, Rural-only Strongholds (such as Farms or Encampments) don't seem to provide anything superior to Buildings of similar Grade to justify an increased cost.</li> </ul><p>Now, if the designer of the Stronghold subsystem came up and contradicted my analysis, I'd happily concede my views. This was the reason I created my thread back in July. But since nobody responded, I'm stuck with my analysis.</p><p></p><p><strong>A Fix?</strong></p><p>Going with the assumption that Rural Strongholds were not supposed to be pricier than Buildings, we can easily correct this error. Here are two alternative tables assuming that Buildings and Rural Strongholds should cost exactly the same in each regard:</p><p></p><p><strong>Table 1: Rural Stronghold Size</strong></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td><strong>Grade</strong></td><td><strong>Rural Area (cost = 500 gp/acre)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>1-2 acres</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>3-10 acres</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>11-20 acres</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>21-50 acres</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>51-100 acres</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>101-200 acres</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>201-500 acres</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>501+ acres</td></tr></table><p></p><p><strong>Table 2: Rural Stronghold Furnishings by Staff</strong></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td><strong>Quality</strong></td><td><strong>Staff by Rural Stronghold Size</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Frugal</td><td>1 per 2 acres</td></tr><tr><td>Average</td><td>1 per acre</td></tr><tr><td>Luxurious</td><td>5 per acre</td></tr><tr><td>Legendary</td><td>5 per acre</td></tr></table><p></p><p>There we go! A lot of pontificating for a minor quibble with Level Up's rules. What do you think? Does it make sense to make Rural Strongholds in line with Buildings? Or is there an obvious reason for making Rural Strongholds more expensive that I'm missing?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ondath, post: 8920212, member: 7031770"] Hey all! This is something that's been bugging me for a while, but I crunched the numbers only recently so I'm hoping to get feedback — either from those who use the A5E rules, or hopefully the ones who designed the Stronghold rules themselves! Thing is, there is a clear discrepancy between Rural Strongholds and Buildings when it comes to bang for your buck, and I'm not sure if this was intentional. [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/is-the-discrepancy-between-building-and-rural-strongholds-intentional.690091/']I made a thread about it way back in July[/URL], but I got tumbleweeds in response, so hopefully the discussion can be slightly more lively now that I can contribute something to the table. [B]If You Go Rural, You're Getting Scammed[/B] So, when you build a Stronghold in Level Up, the costs depend on the stronghold's size. For Buildings, each square foot of building costs 1 gp. For Rural Strongholds, each acre costs 500 gp. For prices in the middle, paying the same amount of gold gives you a Stronghold of equal Grade: 500 gold qualifies either for a Grade 1 Building a Grade 1 Rural Stronghold, 7500 gold for a Grade 3 Building or a Grade 3 Rural Stronghold, etc... But, at the highest and lowest costs for each Grade, Rural Strongholds are simply a bad bargain. Take the Stronghold pricing table in Adventurer's Guide (as well as the a5e.tools website, [URL='https://a5e.tools/rules/building-stronghold']here[/URL]), flip the scale so that it shows not Stronghold area but Stronghold cost thresholds for each Grade, and the pattern becomes obvious: [TABLE] [TR] [TD][B]Grade[/B][/TD] [TD][B]Building Price[/B][/TD] [TD][B]Rural Stronghold Price[/B][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]1[/TD] [TD]100-1000 gp[/TD] [TD][B]500[/B]-[B]2500 [/B]gp[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]2[/TD] [TD]1001-5000 gp[/TD] [TD][B]3000[/B]-5000 gp[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]3[/TD] [TD]5001-10000 gp[/TD] [TD]5500-10000 gp[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]4[/TD] [TD]10001-25000 gp[/TD] [TD]10500-[B]30000[/B] gp[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]5[/TD] [TD]25001-50000 gp[/TD] [TD][B]30500[/B]-[B]60000[/B] gp[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]6[/TD] [TD]50001-100000 gp[/TD] [TD][B]60500[/B]-[B]125000[/B] gp[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]7[/TD] [TD]100001-250000 gp[/TD] [TD][B]125500[/B]-[B]300000[/B] gp[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]8[/TD] [TD]250001+ gp[/TD] [TD][B]300000+[/B] gp[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] In each bolded price point, Rural Strongholds give you less for more. Some of this is due to the 500-gold increments, but most of it is not: 2500 gp gives you a mid-sized Grade 2 Building, but for Rural Strongholds it stays at Grade 1. 28000 gold pieces would get you a Grade 5 Building, but only a Grade 4 Rural Stronghold, and 55000 gp gets you a Grade 6 Building while the Rural Stronghold still lags at Grade 5. This goes beyond the base pricing, too. Rural Strongholds also get fewer staff members when they increase their Furnishing and Staff quality. [B]Is This Intentional[/B]? Given the evident pattern where Rural Strongholds need to pay more both for their base construction and for their furshing and staff, I can't help but wonder if this was a conscious choice. Maybe a simulationist decision made to represent the difficulty of maintaining an open area compared to plopping a building inside a city. Maybe a game design concern in order to balance the stronger features of Rural Strongholds. However, I see nothing that points to these: [LIST] [*]If this were a simulation/flavour decision, I imagine there would be some reasoning given in the section on Strongholds that explained the price discrepancy within the game universe's rules. Something like "Unlike obtaining the lease for a small building inside a city and building your Stronghold there, maintaining a large swath of land as your Stronghold is costly. This is why PCs planning to build Rural Strongholds should be prepared to pay a higher premium." But no such text is in the Strongholds section. [*]The reason I doubt it's a balance decision is the fact that some Strongholds can be either Rural or a Building. This means you can get the benefits of say, a Menagerie, in either form. In such a case, Building it as a Building is the obvious superior option, and if balance were of concern, the Rural version of a Menagerie would probably give some benefit to offset this. Furthermore, other, Rural-only Strongholds (such as Farms or Encampments) don't seem to provide anything superior to Buildings of similar Grade to justify an increased cost. [/LIST] Now, if the designer of the Stronghold subsystem came up and contradicted my analysis, I'd happily concede my views. This was the reason I created my thread back in July. But since nobody responded, I'm stuck with my analysis. [B]A Fix?[/B] Going with the assumption that Rural Strongholds were not supposed to be pricier than Buildings, we can easily correct this error. Here are two alternative tables assuming that Buildings and Rural Strongholds should cost exactly the same in each regard: [B]Table 1: Rural Stronghold Size[/B] [TABLE] [TR] [TD][B]Grade[/B][/TD] [TD][B]Rural Area (cost = 500 gp/acre)[/B][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]1[/TD] [TD]1-2 acres[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]2[/TD] [TD]3-10 acres[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]3[/TD] [TD]11-20 acres[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]4[/TD] [TD]21-50 acres[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]5[/TD] [TD]51-100 acres[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]6[/TD] [TD]101-200 acres[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]7[/TD] [TD]201-500 acres[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]8[/TD] [TD]501+ acres[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] [B]Table 2: Rural Stronghold Furnishings by Staff[/B] [TABLE] [TR] [TD][B]Quality[/B][/TD] [TD][B]Staff by Rural Stronghold Size[/B][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Frugal[/TD] [TD]1 per 2 acres[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Average[/TD] [TD]1 per acre[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Luxurious[/TD] [TD]5 per acre[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Legendary[/TD] [TD]5 per acre[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] There we go! A lot of pontificating for a minor quibble with Level Up's rules. What do you think? Does it make sense to make Rural Strongholds in line with Buildings? Or is there an obvious reason for making Rural Strongholds more expensive that I'm missing? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition (A5E)
A Fix(?) For Rural Stronghold Pricing
Top