Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A glimpse at WoTC's current view of Rule 0
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hawkeyefan" data-source="post: 9510805" data-attributes="member: 6785785"><p>Thanks for answering. </p><p></p><p>You had said earlier that a player doing this could "interfere" with something. What did you have in mind? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, I'm just trying to find out what would be problematic for you about the kind of stuff we're talking about.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's cool. As always, as long as everyone at the actual table is happy, then everything is all good. </p><p></p><p>I'm trying to focus less on what constitutes a preference, and get to the reasons for the preferences. </p><p></p><p>Like, I can elaborate on why I like to give players more leeway with this stuff. I can also explain why I used to have a more traditional mindset... but I don't want to assume anyone shares those reasons... they may be very different than mine. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why? </p><p></p><p>I am genuinely asking. I'm curious why you prefer it that way beyond "because that's my preference" or "that's the default process per the book". </p><p></p><p>We're talking about different ways to play the game. So let's talk about them instead of just perceiving questions as attacks. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay... now this is like a tangible thing we can discuss. This seems to be a reason for your preference, which is what I'm interested in discussing. How would you expect players to abuse it? What are you concerned about? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This seems like a reasonable response and not an agenda-driven one at all!</p><p></p><p>[USER=29398]@Lanefan[/USER] clearly knows more about Torchbearer than the guy who's written a 14-page actual play summary! Good call!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I personally love it when players give me gifts like this. To me, this is very much an opportunity. An entire session (at least) could be based on this. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't know if railroading requires intentionality. I would describe my earliest DMing as railroading for sure... but that's because I didn't really know there was any other way. </p><p></p><p>I wasn't intending to limit anyone or to shut down player contribution... I just thought that's how the game had to work.</p><p></p><p>This is also why... when I see people say things like "this is how the game has to work" it resonates with me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hawkeyefan, post: 9510805, member: 6785785"] Thanks for answering. You had said earlier that a player doing this could "interfere" with something. What did you have in mind? Sure, I'm just trying to find out what would be problematic for you about the kind of stuff we're talking about. That's cool. As always, as long as everyone at the actual table is happy, then everything is all good. I'm trying to focus less on what constitutes a preference, and get to the reasons for the preferences. Like, I can elaborate on why I like to give players more leeway with this stuff. I can also explain why I used to have a more traditional mindset... but I don't want to assume anyone shares those reasons... they may be very different than mine. Why? I am genuinely asking. I'm curious why you prefer it that way beyond "because that's my preference" or "that's the default process per the book". We're talking about different ways to play the game. So let's talk about them instead of just perceiving questions as attacks. Okay... now this is like a tangible thing we can discuss. This seems to be a reason for your preference, which is what I'm interested in discussing. How would you expect players to abuse it? What are you concerned about? This seems like a reasonable response and not an agenda-driven one at all! [USER=29398]@Lanefan[/USER] clearly knows more about Torchbearer than the guy who's written a 14-page actual play summary! Good call! I personally love it when players give me gifts like this. To me, this is very much an opportunity. An entire session (at least) could be based on this. I don't know if railroading requires intentionality. I would describe my earliest DMing as railroading for sure... but that's because I didn't really know there was any other way. I wasn't intending to limit anyone or to shut down player contribution... I just thought that's how the game had to work. This is also why... when I see people say things like "this is how the game has to work" it resonates with me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A glimpse at WoTC's current view of Rule 0
Top