Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 9513696" data-attributes="member: 29398">And are those &quot;many&quot; for whom it's not a concern the same &quot;many&quot; who then complain about how bad their players are when said players, intentionally or otherwise, abuse those advantages?Same here.&nbsp; The projected length of that future is also a consideration; if I knew it was only going to be a 6-month closed-ended campaign I'd be far less concerned about future impact than if potentially having to live with those ideas for 10+ years.I've lost track of who said what but was the prayer-to-Odin example yours?&nbsp; If yes, my take is that a player is always welcome to have a character try something like that but the odds of success are very-to-extremely low; and I'd have a problem with it if those odds became significantly higher leading to an I-win-button situation.There's a difference between being able to make it work and being willing to make it work.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lanefan, post: 9513696, member: 29398"] And are those "many" for whom it's not a concern the same "many" who then complain about how bad their players are when said players, intentionally or otherwise, abuse those advantages? Same here. The projected length of that future is also a consideration; if I knew it was only going to be a 6-month closed-ended campaign I'd be far less concerned about future impact than if potentially having to live with those ideas for 10+ years. I've lost track of who said what but was the prayer-to-Odin example yours? If yes, my take is that a player is always welcome to have a character try something like that but the odds of success are very-to-extremely low; and I'd have a problem with it if those odds became significantly higher leading to an I-win-button situation. There's a difference between being [B]able[/B] to make it work and being [B]willing[/B] to make it work. [/QUOTE]

Verification