Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Guest&nbsp; 85555" data-source="post: 7573014"><p>If Pemerton is getting 100 plus sessions, then he is getting 100+ sessions using the style. I think this is one of those areas where everyone has a harder or easier time running games using certain methods. I know some GMs who can only do a long term campaign using adventure paths (that structure just works for them, even though I really don't enjoy them myself). I will say, I game with some folks who do go more toward the dramatic angle, and they seem to prefer shorter campaigns (simply because a good story can be told in a 6-10 session campaign). I think that is just a preference on their part though. And obviously it depends on how you do it. For me, I find the approach I've talked about (the dramatic sandbox) works well for me, over the long term (and running long term campaigns is important to me when I run a system or choose my campaign approach). Personally, I think most of the problems on this thread, tend to come down to people being overly skeptical of what other people are saying about their experience at the table. You can pull out a word a person says, an assertion they make while trying to defend a style, and dissect it until it seems like you've disproven their experience. But again I think really most of this just boils down people on these threads are very good at making arguments: that doesn't make them right.</p></blockquote><p></p>