Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Thomas Shey" data-source="post: 8513320" data-attributes="member: 7026617">You're quite right, though at least some of those people were modern indy games proponents (one in particular caught my eye), and I'm not sure calling them &quot;the dominant style&quot; is on target (5e people doing it?&nbsp; Absolutely).Well, yeah.&nbsp; As I've noted, there's a certain majoritarian assumption that's very visible around here some times that is, frankly, incredibly tiresome.Yeah.&nbsp; It tends to stand out to me, since even though I'm not a D&amp;D OS type (I only stayed within the D&amp;Dsphere a limited amount of time even back then, so a lot of what proponents of that style consider virtues are things I actively fled), I'm absolutely a creature of that time but some of the resistance to anything that smacks of modernity by some of them is pretty hard to take.On the other hand, you and Sacrosanct (to pick a couple examples) shouldn't be expected to pay for their sins.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Thomas Shey, post: 8513320, member: 7026617"] You're quite right, though at least some of those people were modern indy games proponents (one in particular caught my eye), and I'm not sure calling them "the dominant style" is on target (5e people doing it? Absolutely). Well, yeah. As I've noted, there's a certain majoritarian assumption that's very visible around here some times that is, frankly, incredibly tiresome. Yeah. It tends to stand out to me, since even though I'm not a D&D OS type (I only stayed within the D&Dsphere a limited amount of time even back then, so a lot of what proponents of that style consider virtues are things I actively fled), I'm absolutely a creature of that time but some of the resistance to anything that smacks of modernity by some of them is pretty hard to take. On the other hand, you and Sacrosanct (to pick a couple examples) shouldn't be expected to pay for their sins. [/QUOTE]

Verification