Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A History of Violence: Killing in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Clint_L" data-source="post: 9417013" data-attributes="member: 7035894"><p>I may have previously mentioned that I run games for beginners at my school's D&D Club.</p><p></p><p>The reason I endlessly bring it up, is because playing D&D with students constantly forces me to reckon, in a professional capacity, with many aspects of the game that...eh, I didn't think too hard about when playing with my friends. Certainly not when I was a teenager myself, but even as an adult. Like, I was <em>aware</em> of the issues Snarff raises, and found them abstractly interesting, but I didn't sweat them.</p><p></p><p>But now I don't have that luxury. I am governed by the School Act of British Columbia, which includes a raft of ethical obligations with professional and potentially legal consequences attached. I can get fired for getting it wrong. So I have to think long and hard about what will be included in games I run at school, just as I do about the content I will teach or whether it's a good idea to bootleg for a student who saw me going into a liquor store (this actually happened; he thought it would be really cool of me).</p><p></p><p>So, violence in D&D. Sexy stuff can happen in D&D, but that is easy to handle: in my school games, it basically doesn't exist. I tell my students "PG rating" and they have no trouble understanding that this means. No bewbs.</p><p></p><p>But, as Snarff points out, we have a HIGH tolerance for violence in entertainment. Particularly in North America (incidentally, we just got back from Europe and they think we are really weird about this. People go topless at the drop of a, well, top, and don't sweat sexy content much at all.*** But they regulate violent content much more strictly than we do, especially for children. I am pretty sure that they have it right).</p><p></p><p>So we have to set out what that PG rating means in the context of violence as depicted in a Victoria, BC High School D&D game where students are roleplaying violent people. What we've settled on is that killing people in the context of the game is okay, but the descriptions can't be too gory, and we're not roleplaying sadistic violence. This is kinda lame, TBH. When my kid played in home games in his earlier teens, he delighted in describing finishing blows in the most cartoonishly exaggerated ways imaginable, and it was hilarious. But, yeah, school. We can't do that.</p><p></p><p>So, professionally, I have ruled that solving conflict through murderous violence is totally acceptable in the context of a D&D game, as long as you don't get too visual, and everyone seems pretty cool with it. No complaints. And believe you me, if you screw up and parents hear about it, you get complaints.</p><p></p><p>However, we don't use alignment as part of the game. And that is partially because I want students to at least have to consider whether any particular act of violence is justified.**** And this very much does change how the game is played. When a group of orcs might include some children and furthermore have a pretty good reason to have turned to raiding because they have been pushed to the margins of an expanding nation state, then just killing the orcs to get the treasure is problematic. Our last campaign wound up with the party allying with a group of pirates that they were initially hired to hunt, and then helping them take down a much more wicked group of pirates.</p><p></p><p>TLDR: Violence in entertainment is pretty universal, and I don't think it's automatically a problem. I mean, I'm a lifelong pro wrestling fan. People can distinguish between reality and fiction. But there have to be lines, and those lines depend on context. I do think getting rid of alignment makes decisions about violence a lot more interesting.</p><p></p><p>***Like, we were at Tivoli Gardens in Copenhagen, which is the theme park that Disney copied and supersized, and there is a poster of a cartoon topless woman enticing you to go to a bar right next to the play area for tots. I could post a photo, but forum rules. Note that if it was a poster of a cartoon decapitated body, I'm pretty sure I could post it. See, we are weird about these things.</p><p></p><p>****But mostly because I think the alignment system is strange and weird and does nothing for the story in general.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Clint_L, post: 9417013, member: 7035894"] I may have previously mentioned that I run games for beginners at my school's D&D Club. The reason I endlessly bring it up, is because playing D&D with students constantly forces me to reckon, in a professional capacity, with many aspects of the game that...eh, I didn't think too hard about when playing with my friends. Certainly not when I was a teenager myself, but even as an adult. Like, I was [I]aware[/I] of the issues Snarff raises, and found them abstractly interesting, but I didn't sweat them. But now I don't have that luxury. I am governed by the School Act of British Columbia, which includes a raft of ethical obligations with professional and potentially legal consequences attached. I can get fired for getting it wrong. So I have to think long and hard about what will be included in games I run at school, just as I do about the content I will teach or whether it's a good idea to bootleg for a student who saw me going into a liquor store (this actually happened; he thought it would be really cool of me). So, violence in D&D. Sexy stuff can happen in D&D, but that is easy to handle: in my school games, it basically doesn't exist. I tell my students "PG rating" and they have no trouble understanding that this means. No bewbs. But, as Snarff points out, we have a HIGH tolerance for violence in entertainment. Particularly in North America (incidentally, we just got back from Europe and they think we are really weird about this. People go topless at the drop of a, well, top, and don't sweat sexy content much at all.*** But they regulate violent content much more strictly than we do, especially for children. I am pretty sure that they have it right). So we have to set out what that PG rating means in the context of violence as depicted in a Victoria, BC High School D&D game where students are roleplaying violent people. What we've settled on is that killing people in the context of the game is okay, but the descriptions can't be too gory, and we're not roleplaying sadistic violence. This is kinda lame, TBH. When my kid played in home games in his earlier teens, he delighted in describing finishing blows in the most cartoonishly exaggerated ways imaginable, and it was hilarious. But, yeah, school. We can't do that. So, professionally, I have ruled that solving conflict through murderous violence is totally acceptable in the context of a D&D game, as long as you don't get too visual, and everyone seems pretty cool with it. No complaints. And believe you me, if you screw up and parents hear about it, you get complaints. However, we don't use alignment as part of the game. And that is partially because I want students to at least have to consider whether any particular act of violence is justified.**** And this very much does change how the game is played. When a group of orcs might include some children and furthermore have a pretty good reason to have turned to raiding because they have been pushed to the margins of an expanding nation state, then just killing the orcs to get the treasure is problematic. Our last campaign wound up with the party allying with a group of pirates that they were initially hired to hunt, and then helping them take down a much more wicked group of pirates. TLDR: Violence in entertainment is pretty universal, and I don't think it's automatically a problem. I mean, I'm a lifelong pro wrestling fan. People can distinguish between reality and fiction. But there have to be lines, and those lines depend on context. I do think getting rid of alignment makes decisions about violence a lot more interesting. ***Like, we were at Tivoli Gardens in Copenhagen, which is the theme park that Disney copied and supersized, and there is a poster of a cartoon topless woman enticing you to go to a bar right next to the play area for tots. I could post a photo, but forum rules. Note that if it was a poster of a cartoon decapitated body, I'm pretty sure I could post it. See, we are weird about these things. ****But mostly because I think the alignment system is strange and weird and does nothing for the story in general. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
A History of Violence: Killing in D&D
Top