Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 9511329" data-attributes="member: 2525">The same place your spell checker and grammar checker got it. The same place this very board got it to check the spelling on your replies here. Did your spell checker and grammar checker do that? No, but you use them happily. It's just the word &quot;AI&quot; has been slapped on this, even though it's doing the same kind of thing using the same body of text to train it, that causes an objection. Why? What's the principal behind tagging one as bad and the other as good when neither is actually artificial intelligence it's all just software attempting to summarize and recontextualized text prompts as utility for your personal use.There is no artwork involved in voluntarily taking your own voice and putting it into text, or in summarizing that text. Humans have done this as a matter of course long before the term AI was in use. What's being forced on you with this particular topic. My man, I just spent a huge amount of time typing up directions for people to use, for free, a tool to help their D&amp;D games which doesn't depend on anyone else's works, and you're ranting about Google to me?Yes, you must lose spellchecks if you find this sort of thing objectionable. You're tilting at windmills on this one. There is a meaningful difference between stealing someone's art and novels, repackaging those, and then selling those again; and this stuff which is just you using your own words and getting them summarized for your own use for free for the enhancement of your own game.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 9511329, member: 2525"] The same place your spell checker and grammar checker got it. The same place this very board got it to check the spelling on your replies here. Did your spell checker and grammar checker do that? No, but you use them happily. It's just the word "AI" has been slapped on this, even though it's doing the same kind of thing using the same body of text to train it, that causes an objection. Why? What's the principal behind tagging one as bad and the other as good when neither is actually artificial intelligence it's all just software attempting to summarize and recontextualized text prompts as utility for your personal use. There is no artwork involved in voluntarily taking your own voice and putting it into text, or in summarizing that text. Humans have done this as a matter of course long before the term AI was in use. What's being forced on you with this particular topic. My man, I just spent a huge amount of time typing up directions for people to use, for free, a tool to help their D&D games which doesn't depend on anyone else's works, and you're ranting about Google to me? Yes, you must lose spellchecks if you find this sort of thing objectionable. You're tilting at windmills on this one. There is a meaningful difference between stealing someone's art and novels, repackaging those, and then selling those again; and this stuff which is just you using your own words and getting them summarized for your own use for free for the enhancement of your own game. [/QUOTE]

Verification