Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
A lighter touch for moderation?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pielorinho" data-source="post: 2298313" data-attributes="member: 259"><p>As I've said before, I think the best metaphor for a messageboard is that of a hosted party at someone's house. It's an open party: anyone can drop by. The host isn't really responsible for the behavior of his guests.</p><p></p><p>But in a way he is, because if enough guests behave badly, the other guests are likely to stop having fun. If a single guest gets too belligerent, she can ruin the fun for a whole lot of people. And the host, more than anyone else, is responsible for calming down (or kicking out!) the belligerent guest.</p><p></p><p>The host is also the one putting the most time into the party. Since he's the one creating it, it's really his choice what sort of atmosphere he wants. Some hosts like a rowdy atmosphere in which there's wrasslin on the front lawn; others like a calmer, quieter atmosphere. The guests may suggest a different atmosphere, but in the end, the host gets to decide what sort of party he's throwing.</p><p></p><p>Sure, flame wars can be allowed to continue. But that's not the atmosphere of this party. There's plenty of places online where flamewars may be carried out. The hosts here have decided against them.</p><p></p><p>Consider also that moderating isn't much fun: it means that you get to read the snarkiest, bitterest, meanest posts on the board, and you have to decide whether they're snarky, bitter, and/or mean enough to warrant action. The rest of you are free to ignore threads that have descended into ickiness. Not so the mods: they gotta wallow in it.</p><p></p><p>So although that ickiness doesn't bother you, keep in mind that it bothers the mods; and if we occasionally stop a conversation mid-ick when you think it could've continued successfully, it may be because (in addition to all Henry's excellent points) we don't particularly want to have to wade through another couple pages of ick before things resolve; and we don't want people getting lax about flaming, thinking that it's acceptable behavior. The more people that think it's okay to be snarky, insulting, etc., the more ick we've got to wade through.</p><p></p><p>Daniel</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pielorinho, post: 2298313, member: 259"] As I've said before, I think the best metaphor for a messageboard is that of a hosted party at someone's house. It's an open party: anyone can drop by. The host isn't really responsible for the behavior of his guests. But in a way he is, because if enough guests behave badly, the other guests are likely to stop having fun. If a single guest gets too belligerent, she can ruin the fun for a whole lot of people. And the host, more than anyone else, is responsible for calming down (or kicking out!) the belligerent guest. The host is also the one putting the most time into the party. Since he's the one creating it, it's really his choice what sort of atmosphere he wants. Some hosts like a rowdy atmosphere in which there's wrasslin on the front lawn; others like a calmer, quieter atmosphere. The guests may suggest a different atmosphere, but in the end, the host gets to decide what sort of party he's throwing. Sure, flame wars can be allowed to continue. But that's not the atmosphere of this party. There's plenty of places online where flamewars may be carried out. The hosts here have decided against them. Consider also that moderating isn't much fun: it means that you get to read the snarkiest, bitterest, meanest posts on the board, and you have to decide whether they're snarky, bitter, and/or mean enough to warrant action. The rest of you are free to ignore threads that have descended into ickiness. Not so the mods: they gotta wallow in it. So although that ickiness doesn't bother you, keep in mind that it bothers the mods; and if we occasionally stop a conversation mid-ick when you think it could've continued successfully, it may be because (in addition to all Henry's excellent points) we don't particularly want to have to wade through another couple pages of ick before things resolve; and we don't want people getting lax about flaming, thinking that it's acceptable behavior. The more people that think it's okay to be snarky, insulting, etc., the more ick we've got to wade through. Daniel [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
A lighter touch for moderation?
Top