Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
A lighter touch for moderation?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="woodelf" data-source="post: 2339054" data-attributes="member: 10201"><p>Well, in the context of the original thread, i was countering the claim that it never occurred. It only takes one counter-case to disprove an absolute statement. I wasn't claiming proof that moderation is bad, only that it is possible for a heated thread to turn around and become productive.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, i don't want to turn this into a board-wars thread, but i think that i *can* point to a whole passle of such threads--they're all over RPGNet and r.g.f.advocacy. The former of which seems to have a "as long as you're not making death threats or a non-game-related neo-Nazi political screed, it's ok", and the latter of which doesn't have moderation, AFAIK. I find RPGNet to be a much more hospitable and friendly atmosphere, and the most-obvious difference is the tone of discussion and moderation. But i also have the skin of a rhino, so very little bugs me--so there might be a lot of flameage that just slides off my back and i don't even notice it. [Or i'm just oblivious, if you prefer to characterize it that way. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ]</p><p></p><p>Now, obviously, you can just respond "well, you like it better there, go over there and leave us alone." And perhaps that *is* the solution. But some topics simply generate more-interesting discussions here than anywhere else i'm aware of. </p><p></p><p>And you might be right. Both the generally-positive reputation of EnWorld, and the responses in this thread seem to point to the idea that i'm simply in the minority (at least around here), and i should just deal. The world can't bend to my wishes, and what i needed was to raise the point and have the discussion, not necessarily "win".</p><p></p><p>But i'll counter your challenge with one of my own: can you show that the denizens of EnWorld are any <em>less</em> well-behaved than the general populace? Because i can point to plenty of examples of places that accept much-more-heated discussions, with only self-moderation, and haven't blown up yet. IME, it doesn't take the exceptional individuals you describe to manage it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I haven't been around long enough to witness poor behavior here--did it used to be rowdier? IOW, i wasn't aware that the "observed behavior" was ever actually observed here.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You may well be right. No, let me rephrase that: i think you <em>are</em> right. The mood in individual threads spills over and forms the general tone of the boards. For good and ill. The good, in this case? Civility. The ill? In addition to topics i know i can't discuss (real-world religion), i fear saying things that are a lot less offensive, because i figure they'll get shot down/shut down. Maybe i'm wrong. And i'm sure part of it is personal preference: i'd rather be in an environment that is rowdy and impolite, than one that has the oppresive feel of censorship. Others (presumably yourself) consider what i characterize as 'censorship' to be 'civil standards.' And i understand that there is no absolute standard, so we can both be equally 'right' or 'wrong'.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, i've had my say. Like i said when i started the thread--i wanted to raise the topic for discussion. I've made my points; if they don't persuade, i'm simply outvoted. Such is life.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="woodelf, post: 2339054, member: 10201"] Well, in the context of the original thread, i was countering the claim that it never occurred. It only takes one counter-case to disprove an absolute statement. I wasn't claiming proof that moderation is bad, only that it is possible for a heated thread to turn around and become productive. Well, i don't want to turn this into a board-wars thread, but i think that i *can* point to a whole passle of such threads--they're all over RPGNet and r.g.f.advocacy. The former of which seems to have a "as long as you're not making death threats or a non-game-related neo-Nazi political screed, it's ok", and the latter of which doesn't have moderation, AFAIK. I find RPGNet to be a much more hospitable and friendly atmosphere, and the most-obvious difference is the tone of discussion and moderation. But i also have the skin of a rhino, so very little bugs me--so there might be a lot of flameage that just slides off my back and i don't even notice it. [Or i'm just oblivious, if you prefer to characterize it that way. ;) ] Now, obviously, you can just respond "well, you like it better there, go over there and leave us alone." And perhaps that *is* the solution. But some topics simply generate more-interesting discussions here than anywhere else i'm aware of. And you might be right. Both the generally-positive reputation of EnWorld, and the responses in this thread seem to point to the idea that i'm simply in the minority (at least around here), and i should just deal. The world can't bend to my wishes, and what i needed was to raise the point and have the discussion, not necessarily "win". But i'll counter your challenge with one of my own: can you show that the denizens of EnWorld are any [i]less[/i] well-behaved than the general populace? Because i can point to plenty of examples of places that accept much-more-heated discussions, with only self-moderation, and haven't blown up yet. IME, it doesn't take the exceptional individuals you describe to manage it. I haven't been around long enough to witness poor behavior here--did it used to be rowdier? IOW, i wasn't aware that the "observed behavior" was ever actually observed here. You may well be right. No, let me rephrase that: i think you [i]are[/i] right. The mood in individual threads spills over and forms the general tone of the boards. For good and ill. The good, in this case? Civility. The ill? In addition to topics i know i can't discuss (real-world religion), i fear saying things that are a lot less offensive, because i figure they'll get shot down/shut down. Maybe i'm wrong. And i'm sure part of it is personal preference: i'd rather be in an environment that is rowdy and impolite, than one that has the oppresive feel of censorship. Others (presumably yourself) consider what i characterize as 'censorship' to be 'civil standards.' And i understand that there is no absolute standard, so we can both be equally 'right' or 'wrong'. Anyway, i've had my say. Like i said when i started the thread--i wanted to raise the topic for discussion. I've made my points; if they don't persuade, i'm simply outvoted. Such is life. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
A lighter touch for moderation?
Top